Town Square

Post a New Topic

It is not too late - Reduce Libraries

Original post made by Wil on Oct 27, 2009

Why do we have so many libraries in Palo Alto? Reduce the number of library facilities down to one or two, total. If the city is serious about saving money, build a mega library at a site like Cubberly. Have the citizens use the shuttle to get across town and have everything centralized.

Comments (9)

Posted by Resident, a resident of Midtown
on Oct 27, 2009 at 9:28 am

We have so many libraries in Palo Alto because we have never had a City Council with the strength or courage to close any of them. Lets hope the next City Council will see the light and close a couple of them, but don't hold your breath. It's a Palo Alto political juggernaut!!

Incidentally, the proposed new library in Mitchell Park will need more staff than the present one, that means more hiring and maybe a parcel tax to pay for them.


Posted by Marvin, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Oct 27, 2009 at 9:36 am

And if you read today's Daily Post, they are going to spend $270,000 for a piece of art to go at the new library. But Jim Keene said not to worry, the building will end up costing less than expected so there will be more money for art!!!


Posted by palo alto mom, a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Oct 27, 2009 at 10:02 am

I also still don't understand why we are funding 5 libraries. I understand many people like having so many branches, but many people like steak too - I don't think this economy can support either. Both College Terrace and DT could be repurposed for a better use (maybe even using the land for DT for the Police Department, closing Forest at that block) should we really being buying so many duplicate books? Should we be paying for redundant staff anywhere in the City?

Art - with the talented and generous citizens of PA, why on earth are we paying anyone for art? If you walk around PAMF, do you ever read the signs next to the paintings? Donated in honor of, donate by the artist, etc. Then there is the topic of the art selected by our city (the color of palo alto???)

We should look at this economic downturn as an opportunity to par back spending, rethink priorities and use the immense creativity of our citizens. Just like the tech industry, where downturns produce some great start-ups. This downturn could produce some great ideas.


Posted by Wake Up Council, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 27, 2009 at 10:22 am

Hey city council and city manager/staff,

REDUCE THE NUMBER OF LIBARIES IN PALO ALTO. SAVE MONEY.


Posted by anonymous, a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Oct 27, 2009 at 11:44 am

Mitchell, Children's, Main - that's it. M
aybe a library foundation could operate the college terrace branch, wherever it is.
I just think the downtown branch should be used for the police services.


Posted by Me Too, a resident of Midtown
on Oct 27, 2009 at 12:47 pm

We actually did close 1 library - Terman branch, on Arastradero. I would amend the original post to say we never close as NORTH SIDE libraries - after all, the city is run for the benefit of the north side, right? Unfortunately, aside from Mitchell, there are no more South Side branches left to close or neglect. ;-)


Posted by Darwin, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 27, 2009 at 4:02 pm

The downtown libary was part of the bond, so it is unlikely that they will be closing that branch.

However, the College Terrace library was not part of the bond measure, it's too small, and not use by very many people. They should close this branch while the have the opportunity and while the economy is bad.


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 27, 2009 at 5:07 pm

Many people voted for the library bond because they were frustrated about the conditions of Main and Mitchell, not because they liked the branch system. Even though they thought that we had too many libraries, they felt that a yes vote was the only way to get any progress on the state of the library they used most of the time.

It is now 12 months since the bond passed and we still have no progress.


Posted by Libraries will go on, a resident of Greenmeadow
on Oct 28, 2009 at 9:15 am

"Many people voted for the library bond because they were frustrated about the conditions of Main and Mitchell, not because they liked the branch system."

If you voted in favor of the library bond you also voted to spend $4 Million to refurbish the Downtown Library. Stop kidding yourselves, the voters of Palo Alto voted to support three libraries Mitchell, Main and Downtown.

I am proud to say I voted against the Library bond because I was opposed to including the Downtown Library and the expensive art work. The voters of Palo Alto also voted to approved the $270,000 for the Beasley monument. It was part of the bond measure.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Palo Alto quietly gets new evening food truck market
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,668 views

See Me. Hear Me. Donít Fix Me.
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,821 views

Foothills Park: a world away
By Sally Torbey | 11 comments | 1,627 views

Universal Language
By Cheryl Bac | 3 comments | 1,412 views

Two Days to Save This Dog?
By Cathy Kirkman | 10 comments | 664 views