Town Square

Post a New Topic

Iraq

Original post made by Jag Singh, Duveneck/St. Francis, on Jan 30, 2007

29, January 2007
A startling new book authored by Barry Lando, a former 60 Minutes producer, sheds new light on the complicity of Western nations arming Saddam Hussein when he was committing atrocities on his own people. The book, "Web of Deceit, The History of Western Complicity in Iraq, From Churchill to Kennedy to George W. Bush", traces the historical record of this shameful period in our history. Lando reveals that in the late 1980s Hussein was launching his genocidal attacks on his own people with chemical and other weapons supplied by US arms merchants with the full knowledge and approval of the Reagan and Bush (senior) administrations. Efforts by the U.S. Congress to condemn Saddam Hussein were blocked by the White House. Senators from the farm states (including Senator Dole) rushed to meet Hussein to assure him that the U.S. was largely unconcerned about the genocidal attacks so long as Iraq continued to import U.S. agricultural products. Attempts by Iran to initiate UN intervention and investigations on the use of chemical weapons by Iraq were consistently blocked by the U.S. and United Kingdom. U.S. and other western arms merchants raked in billions of dollars in weapons sales to both Iran and Iraq during their 8 year war.

The rush to hang Saddam Hussein may well have been prompted by a desire to silence him before the unsavory facts connecting him to western leaders was made public.

Comments (7)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 2, 2007 at 4:35 pm

Evaryone knows that Saddam was our ally, or we were his ally, in the war against Iran. When someone comes out wih an expose' of the obvious, it is time for the department of So What to take over.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Albert
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Feb 2, 2007 at 5:24 pm

We were Saddam's ally when he was using poison gas and deadly chemicals against the Kurds and the Iranians, we didn't have any moral repulsion then. At the very same time he was committing heinous crimes against his own people, Donald Rumsfeld was visiting him in Baghdad, knowing very well what he was doing. As a matter of fact, US corporations were providing him with some of the materials. Since we know now that the WMD excuse was a hoax and that there was never any connection between Saddam and 9/11 and islamic terrorism, most of the invasion supporters now claim that we had to invade because, can you believe this:'he used poison gas on the Kurds and Iranians'.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 3, 2007 at 8:41 am

Iran was and is at war with the United States and it was not in our interest to have them also rule Iraq.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Albert
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Feb 3, 2007 at 10:07 am

There had never been a possibility of Iran ruling Iraq until the US made it possible by invading Iraq and help the Shi'ite ascend to power. Now we have a government with close ties to Iran whose power base is Shi'ite religious militias. Just what we needed. Bush turned out to be Iran's best friend and benefactor, making the impossible come true for Iran. The only decision by a head of state that can be compared in its hubris and sheer madness to the decision by the Bush regime to invade Iraq, is probably Hitler's order to invade the USSR in 1942.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 3, 2007 at 7:00 pm

There was indeed a war between Iraq and Iran, and Iraq would have lost without help from us. It would not have been in our interest then or now for Iran to rule the Middle East.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Albert
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Feb 4, 2007 at 9:12 am

Saddam was our best friend in the ME viz-a-vis Iran. He kept them in check and provided a counter balance to their ambitions. The Iranians were so concerned about Saddam that they concentrated all their energy on him and not on their historic ambition of becoming a regional power. Since we were so concerned about Iran, we had to remove their greatest enemy and now Iran is free to become more and more influential, has a friendly government in Baghdad and the ME has never been so hostile to us. Now I really see the logic in the invasion...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 4, 2007 at 10:01 am

It helps the argument for some to forget Kuwait.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Steins, sausage and spaetzle: Mountain View hosts second Oktoberfest
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,171 views

Men Are Good For Three Things
By Laura Stec | 37 comments | 3,007 views

Two creative lights depart Palo Alto, leaving diverse legacies
By Jay Thorwaldson | 2 comments | 1,562 views

Blood in the Fields: Ten Years Inside California's Nuestra Familia Gang
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 939 views

Slow Your Roll
By Cathy Kirkman | 0 comments | 301 views