If only people who live or own property in this "Flood Zone" show up at this meeting the city is likley to take on the responsibility of solving this $100,000,000 problem and pass the cost to everyone in the city.
If you think ,as I do, that the citys responsibility should be confined, primarly, to establishing a "Flood Contro Assesment District" so that the people living in this area should pay all of the costs for controlling the flooding.
The "Storm Drain" parcel tax is being used to install a giant pump on the creek to solve flooding problem in the city. Every parcel in the city is paying this fee to help million and multimillion $$properties from being flooded!!! Enough is enough!!
Storm drains apparently aren't being fixed or installed on miles of streets that don't have them.
This is or was a scheme to make everyone pay for protecting potential properties from being flooded.
Flood zone properties can buy flood insurance to cover their costs of repair, but they apparently don't want to or feel the city should solve this problem.
The Taxing Water Control District also collects money from every property to help fix flooding problems. It is said that the people in the flood affected neighborhoods voted down the fix they wanted to do years ago with the attitude: Don't touch our creek. We don't want you in our neighborhood, go away!!
Isn't it amazing the citys gave some flood victums millions of dollars after the '98 flood. (their attorneys no doubt collecte much of this money) This was your tax money and not insurance money they could have collected if they had bought insurance.
Who is really running this city??
Come to the meeting and say "No tax money for flood control" in Palo Alto.
Also "Remove the bridge and build a dike on Palo Alto Owned Property"
Flooding from the Chaucer ? st bridge is like "Let Palo Alto Residents take the Fall" for flooding thus justifying all city taxpayers dole out millions of$$ to the multimillion dollar property owners who get flooded and can rebuild their homes from our tax dollars.
This story contains 401 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.