Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS   CRIMES & INCIDENTS
  HISTORIC PHOTOS ISSUES BEYOND PALO ALTO   MOVIES   PALO ALTO ISSUES
  RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   INAUGURATION BLOG 2013
  JAY THORWALDSON'S BLOG   LONDON 94301   PAUL LOSCH'S COMMUNITY BLOG   REBECCA WALLACE'S AD LIBS BLOG
  STEPHEN LEVY'S ECONOMY BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MAIN VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
What we should get BACK from the Big 3
Issues Beyond Palo Alto, posted by anonymous, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Dec 9, 2008 at 11:02 am

If we (as in We The People) give the Big 3 all that money, way in excess of what their companies are worth right now, shouldn't WE (all of us) get something back for that?

What sticks in my craw is that the automakers really believe they were giving people what they wanted when they made low-mileage cars and nothing but. My family has low mileage cars, because when we had the money to replace our old cars, we couldn't find anything higher mileage (in the same safety class)!! I was astounded that the Toyota I had in high school in the '70s (and most of my adult life) got better mileage at the end of its life than the brand new model by the same car maker.

Ironically, I told the Volvo dealer in frustration that I would wait for a hybrid if Volvo was coming out with one, and he said they hear that a lot... How come the upper levels of the Big 3 never got that message???

Yes, demand the Big 3 to raise mileage standards. Yes, demand they make electric and hybrid cars. But frankly, we should require them to come up with a business plan (i.e., keeps them solvent, but prioritizes paying US back) that includes inexpensive retrofitting of EXISTING cars on the road to make them more fuel efficient (without sacrificing safety and reliability). That's a faster way to both reduce fossil fuel usage, atone for some of the crap they've been producing in recent years, and help the average American. More people will benefit from being able to increase the efficiency of their engines than will benefit from changes to new cars, and the effect on our world (and economy) will be far more immediate.

Sure, you can't retrofit everything, but choosing certain popular late models would go a long way. I think the benefits to the American consumer, the economy, and the globe, are obvious.

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments
There are no comments yet for this post.
Be the first!

Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   


Best Website
First Place
2009-2012

 

Palo Alto Online   © 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.