Town Square

Post a New Topic

Vacant building

Original post made by WilliamR on Nov 14, 2008

Does anyone know why the old California Craft and Floral building at Forest and Alma has been vacant for so many years? (At least 10 years, as well as I can remember.) I know the real estate market is bad now, but there has been a lot of redevelopment downtown over the years, and no one has touched what seems to be a prime piece of property (location-location-location).

Comments (6)

Posted by bikes2work, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 17, 2008 at 12:27 pm

Actually, a building permit was issued for that property in October of 2007. I have been wondering the same thing as WilliamR for a long time.

From the City's online permit system, the project was described as: "NEW 2-STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING SHELL WITH FINISHED LOBBY CORE, ACCESSIBLE TOILETS AND AT GRADE PARKING. (15,779 s.f.) "

I have no idea why it didn't get constructed, but I think the permit is now expired since no work was started within 1 year. You can look it up. The address is 101 Forest. According to the permit system, they paid over $23,000 for the permit.


Posted by old-timer, a resident of Downtown North
on Nov 17, 2008 at 12:31 pm

I noticed this morning that workers were all over that building and wondered if it was finally being renovated. Don't blame the economy -- it's been vacant since before the boom!


Posted by Paul, a resident of Stanford
on Nov 17, 2008 at 9:43 pm

I heard that a Hooters was going in there.


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 17, 2008 at 10:07 pm

Wishful thinking!(?)


Posted by General Contractor, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on May 1, 2009 at 10:51 am

The demolition is finally under way and will be a huge improvement to the neighborhood. Once the building, concrete slab, and parking lots are gone, we begin construction on a new two story office building. This has been a long time coming.


Posted by Too Much Traffic, a resident of Community Center
on May 1, 2009 at 11:02 am

How did they allow this building to be demolished? Wasn't this building historic?
It would have been better to leave it derelict--a new building will mean jobs and with that more traffic and remember even the addition of one job adds more traffic.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Services, Dining and Shopping Downtown in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 16 comments | 2,256 views

Handmade truffle shop now open in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 2,001 views

It's the End of the World as We Know It: "Snowpiercer"
By Anita Felicelli | 1 comment | 1,504 views

Why is doing nothing so difficult?
By Sally Torbey | 7 comments | 976 views

Call it a novel: Dirty Love by Andre Dubus III
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 167 views