Town Square

Post a New Topic

Study Suggests 86 Percent Of Americans Could Be Overweight Or Obese By 2030

Original post made by sue on Jul 29, 2008


Most adults in the U.S. will be overweight or obese by 2030, with related health care spending projected to be as much as $956.9 billion, according to researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Web Link

More than 86 percent of adults will be overweight or obese by 2030 with approximately 96 percent of non-Hispanic black women and 91 percent of Mexican-American men affected.

This would result in 1 of every 6 health care dollars spent in total direct health care costs paying for overweight and obesity-related costs."

Researchers estimate that children and young adults may have a shorter life expectancy than their parents if the obesity epidemic is left unaddressed.

Comments (18)

Posted by Walter E. Wallis, a resident of Midtown
on Jul 29, 2008 at 3:56 pm

i wonder what the PC word for triage will be.


Posted by sol, a resident of Midtown
on Jul 29, 2008 at 4:01 pm



Fat people should have to pay the full cost of their habits.

Increased airfares.

Increased health insurance premiums.

We have reduced smoking in California by making smokers pariahs,

we need to do the same with fat people.


Posted by Solutions, a resident of Downtown North
on Jul 29, 2008 at 4:28 pm

Educate children and adults about nutrition.

Create powerful financial and social disincentives for junk food creation (Publicly humiliate the CEO's of companies like Kraft, as one example; increased taxes on junk food (like cigarettes - make junk food REALLY expensive via taxation, as another example)

Create powerful incentives for healthy food creation

Compel all school systems (private and public) to remove the swill that most of them feed to our kids

Interventions by physicians, school nurses, teachers, athletic coaches, etc.. There is no reason that a child should be poisoned by his/her parents, out of ignorance)






Posted by fat smoker, a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jul 29, 2008 at 4:32 pm



This is terrible state of affairs

"Researchers estimate that children and young adults may have a shorter life expectancy than their parents if the obesity epidemic is left unaddressed."


I guess they were right who said " you can never be too rich or too thin"

It is time to hold overweight people accountable for their behaviour and the costs they impose on the rest of us.


Posted by Parent, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 29, 2008 at 4:32 pm

How about regulation of portions at restaurants? Some portions are big enough for three meals let alone take home leftovers for the next days lunch. Even a salad is usually big enough for two to share.

Subway has done great unjustice with its $5 footlongs, because it is so economical to buy twice as much food for about an extra $1 and then eat it all instead of sharing or saving for later.


Posted by sue, a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Jul 29, 2008 at 4:54 pm



Applebee's Fiesta Lime Chicken packs 1,290 calories.
Pizzeria Uno's Individual Chicago Classic (serves one) has 2,310.
Who could eat another bite after an appetizer like T.G.I. Friday's Jack Daniel's Sampler at 2,330?

Bear in mind that to maintain their present weight, most men should consume from 2,000 to 2,500 calories a day; most women from 1,500 to 1,800, depending on activity level and size.

My experience is that portions are much smaller in Europe


Posted by sam, a resident of Midtown
on Jul 29, 2008 at 6:32 pm



What a horror, soon the fit will discriminated against as a minority but wait ------ the obese claim they are discriminated again how can that be.


Posted by fat smoker, a resident of Midtown
on Jul 30, 2008 at 3:36 pm



People know what makes them fat and they know how to loose weight, there is no mystery just a matter of following through.

If they do not follow through they will suffer the health consequences and should pay for them themselves.


Posted by Sylvia, a resident of Stanford
on Jul 30, 2008 at 3:50 pm

"push away from the table", FAT ASS!


Posted by bike, a resident of College Terrace
on Jul 30, 2008 at 7:22 pm



How about banning fat people from all you can eat cafes and holding parents of fat children accountable for child neglect?


Posted by Jack, a resident of Palo Verde
on Jul 30, 2008 at 8:14 pm

Obesity is a disease. Just like alcoholism, tobacco addition, drug addiction, sex addiction, liberalism.

We need a single-payer national health care system to help defeat these diseases.


Posted by fireman, a resident of another community
on Jul 31, 2008 at 6:54 am

The City of Palo Alto had the fattest Fire Chief I have ever seen or heard of in the Fire Service.
So FAT that he could not even complete the physical requirements for the job.
So HE CHANGED them. Got rid of the part that siad you must be able to perform your duties.
That is a big part of a job discrition to get rid of, "Being able to perform your duties?"
And yes he had health issues that cost huge amounts of money in benifits.


Posted by Parent, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 31, 2008 at 11:16 am

You people are idiots. Fatness isn't a crime any more than driving an SUV is a crime, than letting your kids ride skateboards (or even having kids for that matter), than failing to use sunscreen, than putting your kids in too many sports, than drinking wine, beer or margaritas, than a million other unhealthy things that aren't any of your business. Being fat is no beeswax of anyone elses than the person who's fat. And who says they don't pay their own way? In fact, fatness is creating economic growth - they buy more food, they eat out more, they buy more clothes (because they cycle through sizes up and down more often), they keep the diet industry (and the fitness industry) in business. And yes, they do pay more for insurance. They may or may not need more healthcare services - I know some very thin people who have big cholesterol issues, thyroid issues, who are clumsy, lazy and stupid (cause accidents, hurt themselves, are sickly, etc.) - and I know fat people who have perfectly healthy lifestyles, no high blood pressure, cholesterol or any other healthy issues and never miss a day of work.

the article says fatness will create a $956Billion in health care related spending. That's 956Billion in spending created for our economy. Thats creation of a lot of jobs.

Luckily underweight people are apparently going to shortly be in the minority and perhaps then we can outlaw jerks and losers who think their 'stuff' doesn't stink.

Speaking of short, maybe we should start charging short near sited people for the burden they cause to society. Perhaps we should charge mentally ill people for the burden they create, perhaps we should charge people who have more than one kid for the burden they cause, etc etc etc. Get a life and worry about your own problems.


Posted by bike, a resident of College Terrace
on Jul 31, 2008 at 2:29 pm



It appears that fat ratios are most important for heart disease

# Men in the top one-fifth of the distribution (those with the biggest waists in relation to their hips) had a 55 percent higher risk of developing coronary heart disease compared to men in the bottom one-fifth of the distribution (those with the smallest waists in relation to their hips).
# Women in the top one-fifth, or the highest waist-to-hip ratio group, were 91 percent more likely to develop heart disease than women with the smallest waists in relation to their hips.


Posted by The Russian, a resident of another community
on Jul 31, 2008 at 2:47 pm

Isn't the savior of the planet wearing a fat apron?

How about Al Gore-eo cash in his carbon credits on a treadmill hooked to a generator and start making some electrons and thinning out his lard reserves?

That would be real leadership.


Posted by who cares?, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 31, 2008 at 4:19 pm

bike - and this is your concern, how? Do you also protest against same sex marriage?


Posted by Walter E. Wallis, a resident of Midtown
on Jul 31, 2008 at 5:39 pm

When people start gaining weight at the same rate government has been, then I worry. The department of obesity control will likely, in 10 years, be larger than the War Department entering WWII.


Posted by bike, a resident of College Terrace
on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:38 am



Al Gore is truly obese and does not seem to be concerned, i guess he is thinking globally and not acting locally neither in his massive appetite for food nor energy for his house and glob trotting by plane.

He is not a good role model for our children.

There is a darwinian solution to unhealthy living, we do not need more government programs, just hold people accountable financially for their habits.

In the old days we used to call it sloth and gluttony, 2 of the 7 deadly sins.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Scott’s Seafood Mountain View to close, reopen as new concept
By Elena Kadvany | 13 comments | 4,218 views

How Bad Policy Happens
By Douglas Moran | 21 comments | 1,425 views

The life of Zarf
By Sally Torbey | 10 comments | 1,065 views

Freshman Blues Don't Mean Wrong College
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 780 views

When Grandparents Visit
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 777 views