Town Square

Post a New Topic

Hugo Chavez

Original post made by jag singh, Duveneck/St. Francis, on Sep 24, 2006

This story contains 127 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (7)

Like this comment
Posted by Gene
a resident of Professorville
on Sep 24, 2006 at 7:10 pm


Are you a college sophomore? You sound like it. Do you want to get serious?

I am willing to take you on, but I just want to know if you are willing. I am speaking about a real discussion, Jag. Are you there?

Like this comment
Posted by trudy
a resident of Crescent Park
on Sep 25, 2006 at 4:51 am

Dear Gene,

It is always a pleasure to see someone like yourself engage in a reasoned discourse about serious issues, instead of resorting to personal attacks, the last resort of those without any ground to stand on.

Like this comment
Posted by Boaz
a resident of Greater Miranda
on Sep 25, 2006 at 9:01 am

Trudy--perhaps you are not familiar with Jag's posts and letters.
His writings are filled with half-truths, distortions and innuendo. He has been known and caught on this forum cutting and pastings portions of people's writings and then twisting them for his own purpose.
Jag's writings are filled with personal attacks against the Jewish people, Israel and others who does not fit his distorted view of muslim terrorism (i.e. it is all the Jews/Israels fault).
What ground are you standing on?????

Like this comment
Posted by trudy
a resident of Crescent Park
on Sep 27, 2006 at 5:45 am

Everything Jag has posted above is true. What he's posted elsewhere, I have no idea.

As for Israel, etc. its destruction of Lebanon (not once but twice), and brutal military occupation of Palestine (in violation of U.N. mandates 242 and 338 calling upon it to withdraw) and the Geneva convention prohibiting a military occupier from settling its civilians in occupied territories speaks volumes.

It certainly is true that the vast animosity against the U.S. in the Muslim/Arab world is the result primarily of U.S. backing for these Israel actions, although the U.S. has done plenty of other disgusting things, such as overthrow the previous Democratic regime in Iran so it could install its puppet Shah, to earn animosity other than that.

It's typical of Israel's backers to respond not with logic, since they can't, but with attempting to damage the reputations of its critics.

Like this comment
Posted by Boaz
a resident of Greater Miranda
on Sep 27, 2006 at 6:13 am

WEll put, Trudy--too bad nothing you have written has anything to do with the reality of situation.
Then you also say that anyone that dares to criticize you or Jag is guilty of damaging your reputation.
You should, before you start writing, learn some history. Go back and read the complete text of UN resolutions 242 and 338, not just the portions you quote out of contect.
And if you want to rely on UN resolutions, then what about the UN resolutions regarding Lebanon and Hezbollah?
It is too bad that you parrot that old canard that the US problems in the Middle East are due to a country the size of NEw Jersey.
Do not let the fact sget in the way of your thinking

Like this comment
Posted by Gene
a resident of Professorville
on Sep 27, 2006 at 3:18 pm

"Bush effectively torpedoed years of quiet diplomacy by calling heads of state “Axis of Evil” and even mocked the ‘pint sized North Korean leader’ as a ‘pygmy’! What hypocrisy!"

Trudy, Jag said this, right?

Well, Reagan described the Soviet system as an "evil empire". He was right. He went with the truth, and he won the cold war. Now Bush told the truth about Iraq, Iran and North Korea. He did not undermine quiet diplomacy, since that diplomacy was only helping the evil rulers in those countries.

Like this comment
Posted by Steve
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Sep 29, 2006 at 7:51 am

"....given the CIA attempted to orchestrate an abortive coup"

Hey Jag....just FYI....your Central Intelligence Agency does not orchaestrate "abortive" coups....they orchaestrate coups period. Some may end up being abortive...some may be successful. Unfortunetly, the one to which you referred was abortive and that tyrant is still in power. Maybe the next one we try in Caracas will be successful and the people of Venezuela will get the freedom to write silly complaints about their country in the press like you do.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Tava Kitchen shutters in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 17 comments | 21,015 views

Top 6 Issues Affecting Seniors to keep an eye on as Donald Trump takes over
By Max Greenberg | 6 comments | 3,392 views

By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,355 views

Packing for the Women's March
By Sally Torbey | 9 comments | 805 views