Use of ‘pretexting’ by HP is way out of line
Original post made by Diana Diamond, Palo Alto Online blogger, on Sep 7, 2006
On Wednesday, an HP spokesman defended Dunn's actions, saying such leaks to the media are inappropriate and out of line, hence the investigation into the personal phone calls of board members.
I disagree with the defense. This was an ethical misjudgment by Dunn, to say the least, an inappropriate invasion of privacy, and perhaps an illegal act.
If I was on the HP board, I would be absolutely outraged. Serving on any board or commission simply does not entitle the chairman or any other corporate official to try to determine under pretext who I talked to every day.
I am not defending the leaks to the media, although I can't get too upset about them. The more important issue here is the invasion of privacy.
You might ask what's wrong with getting the phone records of board members after all, someone on the board was leaking information to the press.
A lot is wrong. The end doesn't justify the means. Even if I serve on a board, whether it's HP, the Red Cross, or a city planning commission, no corporation and no government, in my estimation, has the right to surreptitiously find out who I call and talk to each day and who calls me especially from my home or my personal cell phone. Our rights to privacy are an inherent part of our civil liberties in this country.
In this age of wiretapping of Americans by the federal government, it may be a right we really need to fight to protect.
Strong Regional Job and Population Growth Continues
By Steve Levy | 7 comments | 1,073 views
Guest Post #2 from HSSV: Labradoodle Back on His Feet
By Cathy Kirkman | 3 comments | 516 views