Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS   CRIMES & INCIDENTS
  HISTORIC PHOTOS   ISSUES BEYOND PALO ALTO   MOVIES   PALO ALTO ISSUES
  RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   INAUGURATION BLOG 2013
  JAY THORWALDSON'S BLOG   LONDON 94301   PAUL LOSCH'S COMMUNITY BLOG   REBECCA WALLACE'S AD LIBS BLOG
  STEPHEN LEVY'S ECONOMY BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MAIN VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
Use of ‘pretexting’ by HP is way out of line
Diana Diamond's Blog, posted by Diana Diamond, Palo Alto Online blogger, on Sep 7, 2006 at 9:03 am
Diana Diamond is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online

The chairman of the board of Hewlett-Packard, Patricia Dunn, worried about boardroom leaks to the media, decided to hire a firm to get the cell and landline phone records of HP board members to see if she could determine who “leaked” information to the press, particularly the Wall Street Journal. The firm used a technique called “pretexting” – calling the phone company and pretending to be someone else in order to get the board that person’s phone records.

On Wednesday, an HP spokesman defended Dunn’s actions, saying such leaks to the media are inappropriate and out of line, hence the investigation into the personal phone calls of board members.

I disagree with the defense. This was an ethical misjudgment by Dunn, to say the least, an inappropriate invasion of privacy, and perhaps an illegal act.

If I was on the HP board, I would be absolutely outraged. Serving on any board or commission simply does not entitle the chairman or any other corporate official to try to determine under pretext who I talked to every day.

I am not defending the leaks to the media, although I can’t get too upset about them. The more important issue here is the invasion of privacy.

You might ask what’s wrong with getting the phone records of board members — after all, someone on the board was leaking information to the press.

A lot is wrong. The end doesn’t justify the means. Even if I serve on a board, whether it’s HP, the Red Cross, or a city planning commission, no corporation and no government, in my estimation, has the right to surreptitiously find out who I call and talk to each day— and who calls me — especially from my home or my personal cell phone. Our rights to privacy are an inherent part of our civil liberties in this country.

In this age of wiretapping of Americans by the federal government, it may be a right we really need to fight to protect.


Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by Howard, a resident of the Crescent Park neighborhood, on Sep 11, 2006 at 10:39 pm

The Board knew that they were being investigated, and approved that investigation. Perkins was the biggest cheerleader, suggesting that everyone on the board be given lie detector tests. It was only after his golfing buddy on the board turned out to be the culprit that he suddenly feigned outrage at the investigation. Pretexting is not illegal (except perhaps under some stretch of some unrelated statute cooked up by the attorney general to get headlines), and in these circumstances it is not unethical to so target the board. Pretexting the reporters is another story, and was a mistake. But other than apologizing to the reporters, which has been done, HP should not back down.


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   


Best Website
First Place
2009-2012

 

Palo Alto Online   © 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.