Town Square

Post a New Topic

Political Signs on Public Property

Original post made by Voter, Duveneck/St. Francis, on Feb 1, 2008

During the last election, my Republican candidate political signs were confiscated by a Palo Alto code enforcement officer, who claimed that they were on public property, since they were posted in front of my house between the sidewalk and the street.
As I drive around Palo Alto this week, I see dozens of Democratic candidate political signs in the same "public property" and yet they are not subject to confiscation by Palo Alto code enforcement officers.
Why is there a difference?

Comments (11)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Neighbor
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Feb 1, 2008 at 11:59 am

The Code Enforcement officer will only remove illegally posted signs if they get a lot of complaints. Don't feel bad I've had my Democratic signs removed during past elections. And, you will be happy to know, I walked past many Mitt Romney signs this morning.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Danny
a resident of Crescent Park
on Feb 1, 2008 at 12:12 pm

Many of the police I know are Republicans, so I highly doubt removal of candidate signs has anything to do with the political party.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by GMC
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 1, 2008 at 12:44 pm

Imagine all the greenhouse gases and pollution created by making all of these signs and then chucking them in trash or recycling after the election. Seriously- I'm not saying ban the signs, but just think about it - in every town, in every state, hundreds of thousands of these things created, and it probably doesn't make a huge difference in the election.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Crescent Park
on Feb 3, 2008 at 9:56 am

Let's get real. There are many Democrat signs all over the place in very public, well traveled areas. The police would have to be blind to not see them. Get rid of them now.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by palo alto mom
a resident of Crescent Park
on Feb 3, 2008 at 10:26 am

The police (and the taxpayers) should not be responsible for removing the signs, Republican or Democrat. The campaign offices should send their staff out to remove them off public property (There are even signs on school grounds at Walter Hays.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by paly parent
a resident of Professorville
on Feb 3, 2008 at 2:40 pm

thank you to whoever cleaned up the hundreds of signs along Middlefield!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by perspective
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 3, 2008 at 2:44 pm

I am with GMC...who really votes based on the number of signs they see? Are there really such sheep who can't just figure out the issues and what they want for themselves? Do we really want people to vote who can only make decisions in this way?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by paly parent
a resident of Professorville
on Feb 4, 2008 at 2:04 pm

People really are influenced by signs, especially if someone you respect is supporting a candidate or cause. There are also the sheep who will just follow the masses...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Terry
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 4, 2008 at 2:32 pm

In local elections, for sure, signs are very big. You see it in PA, but all over the country. Since name recognition is usually low and the idea that "my neighbors" publicly support someone has a big impact. In many places, lawn signs are the biggest campaign expenditure for a local campaign.

I'm less sure how much they move the needle for more visible campaigns.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Palo Alto Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Feb 5, 2008 at 4:08 am

All I can say is, signs in my neighborhood and local driving areas do NOT influence whom *I* choose to vote for. Never have, and most likely never will. All they tell me is who my neighbors like - but *I* am not my neighbors, nor am I close friends with my neighbors (though we are perfectly cordial.) :)


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Feb 5, 2008 at 8:04 am

Signs are more likely to cause disharmony between neighbors rather than influence neighbors to vote like minded.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 2,903 views

WUE makes out-of-state tuition more affordable
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 2 comments | 2,765 views

Ode to Brussels Sprout
By Laura Stec | 14 comments | 2,348 views

Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,791 views

A Surprise!
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 861 views