Town Square

Post a New Topic

Romney Wins Republican Debate

Original post made by Resident on Jan 31, 2008

Mitt Romney presented as Presidential, while John McCain continued to assert lies about Romney's position on the war in Iraq, even with Gov. Romney sitting right next to him at the Republican Debate last night. McCain's assertions looked petty and made the senator's performance less Presidential and more like a good-old-boy network of Washington insiders. While the usual Washington insiders clearly are backing McCain, the change portion of the Republican Party are overwhelmingly supporting Romney. Romney stated his position on all the issues clearly. McCain refused to answer specific questions about his position, now and in the past, on immigration.

Comments (16)

Posted by anonymous, a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jan 31, 2008 at 9:41 am

McCain demonstrates good sense in being reasonable and being willing to work across the aisle. For this he gets criticized by far-right extremists in the Republican party! Unbelievable.

If you think Romney would win the general election, you are dreaming, and it has nothing to do with his religion and everything to do with his ultra-conservative stands and condescending attitudes, there is NO chance of his appealing to the overall population of American voters.


Posted by Pam, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Jan 31, 2008 at 9:46 am

Doesn't matter - either one is dog meat in the general election


Posted by Resident, a resident of another community
on Jan 31, 2008 at 10:11 am

I hope Romney becomes the Republican's Presidential candidate; he will be easier to beat than McCain.


Posted by Joanna, a resident of Adobe-Meadows
on Jan 31, 2008 at 11:52 am

"I hope Romney becomes the Republican's Presidential candidate; he will be easier to beat than McCain."

True. True. Especially since Obama and McCain both appeal to the same type of voter. Er, somewhat.


Posted by Signmeup, a resident of Crescent Park
on Feb 1, 2008 at 8:11 am

I'm hoping Clinton becomes the Democrat nominee. McCain can without a doubt beat her (and her little man-dog too).


Posted by perspective, a resident of Midtown
on Feb 1, 2008 at 10:46 am

First of all: All I heard anywhere on radio were ads for CNNS Democrat debate...how did you know about the Republican one? (By the way, does anyone still have any doubts that CNN is the propoganda arm of the Democrats?)

Second of All: Honestly, either Republican candidate is so far to the left, that I will probably stay home and let the Democrat President take the blame for destroying our economy, our sovereignty, our free speech, our border plan and our security...at least we would finally put to rest the constant and unending mantra that America is racist/sexist ( depending on which identity politician wins).

I have read that McCain, at least, has some credibility with keeping taxes down, but frankly he is so anxious to please the left and the media that I have no doubt at all that he will roll over on that.

As for Iraq, it doesn't matter who gets in, we will simply keep drawing down at a safe and reasonable pace as Iraqis themselves keep drawing up. There is no other responsible choice.

I am readying myself for another bout of "Carter years"...hold on everyone, and prepare for inflation, regulation, higher unemployment, lower standard of living for the poor, and emboldening of fascists everywhere!


Posted by perspective, a resident of Midtown
on Feb 1, 2008 at 10:49 am

Maybe after the country has its very liberal policies ..um...climax...and sees the effects, it will swing right again, like the post Carter era that brought in Reagan policies and a strong nation, in American idealism and exceptionalism, security and economically, again..


Posted by Danny, a resident of Crescent Park
on Feb 1, 2008 at 12:30 pm

I think Republicans would be happy if a rich, white man were in the Oval office for eternity. That's my big problem with the conservative base -- it's as though they can't see the value of diversity. To the Republicans, if you aren't a welathy, Caucasian, Chrisitian male, you have no business running for president.


Posted by Gary, a resident of Downtown North
on Feb 1, 2008 at 1:14 pm

"To the Republicans, if you aren't a welathy, Caucasian, Chrisitian male, you have no business running for president. "

All Democrat presidents have been been white males. Most of them have been wealthy or connected to wealth, through previous political connections. Most have been Christians, certainly the previous two.

It was the Dems that tried to lynch Clarence Thomas. A number of conservative black politicians have been quite popular with conservative white Republican males. Many of them loved Margaret Thatcher (The Iron Lady).

This is to say that policies matter much more than race/gender with Republicans. In fact, Edwards was very much in tune with policies that the Dems espouse, but his race and gender were held against him. The Dems are not the party of Lincoln.

If it turns out to be Obama vs. McCain, there will be a straight forward debate on Iraq: Continue the liberation, or cut and run. If Obabma prevails, he will break his promise, and stay, becasue the stakes are too high to do otherwise.



Posted by Robo Candidate Eaton, a resident of Downtown North
on Oct 25, 2011 at 10:25 am

This is a 4 year old thread. Thanks to Gary Resident and Perspective for contributing.

One forgets how long Romney has been running for a job, spending a ton of his own money along with his contributors (mostly from Utah, along with a ton of Wall St bankster cash.)

The hairdo guy still can't bust thirty percent. It's a rare poll that gives him above 25% among GOP candidates.

Everyone comes along and has a moment in the spotlight ahead of Romney, and fades to another rising star (Michelle O'Bachman, Perry, Cain, etc...)

Can poor little Mitt ever find love in the GOP?

After looking in all the wrong places (as the song goes) for 5 years?


Posted by Perspective, a resident of Meadow Park
on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:22 am

Prescient, weren't we, Gary?

( or perhaps just able to connect the dots and predict results...nothing magic about it, just wise. I just wish I could have gotten out of the way of the train wreck so many of us predicted..but our feet were trapped on the tracks and down we went.

And here we are again.


Posted by Robo Candidate Eaton, a resident of Meadow Park
on Oct 25, 2011 at 11:42 am

Which trainwreck?

The Bush trainwreck or McCain's candidacy trainwreck?


Posted by Perspective, a resident of Meadow Park
on Oct 26, 2011 at 10:25 am

If any of you read Gary's or my posts, you will see we were prescient about this Administration's TRAINWRECK policies and posturing.

BTW, didja notice that ACORN is behind OccupyWall Street stuff?
Web Link
It has gotten to the point where I am not at all surprised that a "disbanded" and discredited and not-really-defunded by tax money group is somehow still functioning to destroy America. They helped bring about the mortgage crisis,( never forget Obama's signature as an attorney for ACORN suing Citibank to force it to make bad loans Web Link) and now are trying to complete the job of economic chaos so we throw ourselves onto government begging for mommy and daddy to save us in exchange for our liberty.

Well, most of us are not surprised, I am sure.


Posted by Robo Candidate Eaton, a resident of Meadow Park
on Oct 26, 2011 at 11:09 am

"If any of you read Gary's or my posts, you will see we were prescient about this Administration's TRAINWRECK"

Did read them, but it's obvious you knew the economy was in trouble no matter who won: "that I will probably stay home and let the Democrat President TAKE THE BLAME for destroying our economy, our sovereignty, our free speech, our border plan and our security.."

After all, Bush had this country losing half a million jobs a month when you made that post almost 4 years ago.

Security? Wrongo, bucko. Obama has been masterful in national security compared to Bush. Bin Ladin, Al Alaki, Gaddafi and so amny more.

Americans killed by terrorists under Bush - 3,000 at least. Soldiers killed under Bush in near useless wars - almost 10,000? Money borrowed from China to fight useless wars by Bush? a trillion plus.

American soldiesr killed to support the overthrow of Gaddafi? Zero. Cost? about 1/1000th of Iraq.

Remember that Bush said, just 6 months after 9/11, that he didn't think about Bin Ladin anymore, even though he promised him dead or alive. Then let him go at Tora Bora.

Web Link


Posted by profit, a resident of St. Claire Gardens
on Oct 26, 2011 at 11:23 am

yes,we won over Gaddafi,what is the price, go get their cash in our banks, and their oils to reimberse us.


Posted by Robo Candidate Eaton, a resident of Meadow Park
on Oct 26, 2011 at 6:15 pm

Profit:

You're concerned about a billion in Libya to help get rid of a tyrant, after spending over a trillion in Iraq?

$1 billion is chump change in Iraq. Someone even stole larger amounts than that in Iraq - "$6.6 billion may be "the largest theft of funds in national history."

"Pentagon officials determined that one giant C-130 Hercules cargo plane could carry $2.4 billion in shrink-wrapped bricks of $100 bills. They sent an initial full planeload of cash, followed by 20 other flights to Iraq by May 2004 in a $12-billion haul that U.S. officials believe to be the biggest international cash airlift of all time."

Web Link

"For the first time, federal auditors are suggesting that some or all of the cash may have been stolen, not just mislaid in an accounting error. Stuart Bowen, special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, an office created by Congress, said the missing $6.6 billion may be "the largest theft of funds in national history.""


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Indian street food and ... bitcoins?
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,189 views

Most Seniors do not Need Senior Housing But Could Benefit from other Choice to Remain in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 31 comments | 1,522 views

"The Galapagos Affair: Satan Came to Eden"
By Anita Felicelli | 0 comments | 1,159 views

I Spy
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 1,005 views

The Cinderella ride
By Sally Torbey | 10 comments | 798 views