Posted by R Wray, a resident of the Palo Verde neighborhood, on Jan 15, 2008 at 4:34 pm

I think "Obambi" might beat "Clintzilla", but it's purely a matter of style.

Posted by Joanna, a resident of the Adobe-Meadows neighborhood, on Jan 15, 2008 at 5:18 pm

Obama

We tend to "get it" before the rest of the country.

Posted by A Voter, a resident of the Crescent Park neighborhood, on Jan 16, 2008 at 11:55 am

Please! No more Clinton sleaze.

Posted by janette, a resident of the College Terrace neighborhood, on Jan 16, 2008 at 1:16 pm

Anyone but Hillary. She's the Democratic candidate, I'm voting for McCain.

Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Jan 16, 2008 at 1:27 pm

I don't see why someone wants less Clinton sleaze, there seems to be plenty of people who want Bush sleaze in this Forum.

Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Jan 17, 2008 at 4:05 pm

As this question keeps jumping at me when I read the home page, I am wondering why it was decided to put the candidates in order of their first names in alphabetical order. Generally speaking, people are listed in alphabetical order of their last names. In this particular decision, the order is changing Barak Obama from bottom to top. Is this subtle listing indicative of the leanings of the Weekly in this political race?