Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Nov 12, 2007
Is it possible to short a venture capital firm?
Will Al Gore make the KPCB folks give up their private jets and fly commercial? Oh wait, he doesn't fly commercial, he hops on the Google jets.
Wait until the first IPO with Gore goes public, watch it pop up for a couple months and then short it.
Seriously, you can't expect a Nobel prize winner, former Vp and senator to go tooling around the country in a Tom Hanks Prius, or a Forrest Gump walkathon, or even, perish the thought, public transportation to spread the gospel. Secret service would have a serious case of the runs.
His new partners at KPCB would have to find a biojetfuel supplier or
just use their secret star power(a new energy source?) to stay safely above the masses.
This begs the question, why shouldn't all those V.C's and presidential aspirants settle for the President's annual salary, no options or fringes? Just a plain old working man's salary. Seems good enough for the rest of us to get by on limited means.
What? The last three posters don't understand venture capital very well.
Gore will be a powerful asset to KPCB in drawing innovative green (and other) technologies, as well as being able to open doors (all over the world) for KPCB companies that they haven't heretofore been able to open. Gore is a supremely well-networked guy.
Maybe they will finance Nuclear Power Plants in this area! Or is committed to coal as he seems to always have been in the past when he had to power for the country to go modern, CO2 free Nuclear.
hmmmm.... and why is this thread classified under crimes and incidents?
Because the event itself constitutes and incident, and crime happens all the time. Why not?
Mike - Like all good Palo Altans, I understand the VC business - that is why I said you should short Al Gore's companies after the IPO and when the lockups are expiring.
oh, you mean like Google, Amazon, etc.? :)
Here's a bet; if a stock backed by Gore and KPCB funds makes it to an IPO, you will lose money if you short in the near term - even when the lockups are expiring.
You fundamentally misunderstand the intangibles behind partnering with Gore, as your claim is that anything he backs will be fluff, and people will bail as lockups expire. Keep betting, and let me know whan you start winning.
btw, Colin Powell is a limited KPCB partner.
KPCB isn't at the top of the game because they hire the wrong partners. What do you know that they don't? And, when did you raise your last fund?
Colin Powell is a "strategic limited partner" which is a new one on me - but I assume means he attends an offsite or two and opens his rolodex when asked.
I usually don't agree with Mike (or he with me ;-) but in this case I agree about not shorting. I saw a study of post-IPO performance of KP companies; there was something like an average 4x increase in value three years from time of distribution, looking back all the way to Fund I. I don't think you'll make good money shorting KP companies as a portfolio.
That said, there is not a great track record of people doing well entering VC from other industries at a senior level (even tech execs have a mixed record). As Doerr has been quoted, it takes 6-8 years and $20 million in losses to train a fighter pilot or a VC (and that $20 is probably $40 million now). We'll see how Gore does.
Gore will not be trained as a typical VC; he will be deployed as a technology scout and as a government insider who can leverage his enormous international and domestic network to bring advantage to KPCB's portfolio.
Think government contracts; think legislative influenence; think the security industry; think green technologies - all these are Gore's bailiwick, and more. His presence at a firm mlike KPCB will be enormous. Also, he's a *very* smart guy, who was known as the hardest working member of the Congress when he was a legislator.
Powell's standing with KPCB is in much the same vein, but with far less "punch" than Gore can bring to the team re: the areas mentioned above (and more).
One thing is certain:President Gore will not plunge his new VC firm into astronomical deficits that it will never be able to pay off.
There are some significant plays in the 'soft energy' approach, for instance nanotech/polymer/buckyball stuff (e.g. Konarka - Alan Heeger). These plays have a reassonalbe chance of making money. But they will not make much of a difference, in terms of energy supply. The only big player, for the next couple of decades is nuclear power.
Wow, Mike, I didn't realize you were a partner at KP ;=)
Terry, Let's just say that I have inside access to a wide range of information, and leave it at that. :))
You take your talking points from Amory Lovins, etal. . He is a smart guy, but hopelessly naive. You don't seem to have any real "inside" knowledge. Neither he, nor you have an answer to the HUGE demand on electrical that is just around the corner, specifically the need to charge electric cars.
The only way is nuclear power.
Mike, thanks for reminding me that Google and Amazon were backed by the Goracle. I had completely forgotten that he invented the internet!
Anyhow, it is pointless for us to argue over whether big Al will be a good parter at KP, because it is well known that "the debate is over". Anyone who disagrees is a Holocaust denier! You are all hereby cowed into silence.
Al Gore = puppet
Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers = puppet masters
To: Al, cut your gut and really reduce your carbon imprint.
I am not sure who is fatter by BMI hillary or al?
"The only big player, for the next couple of decades is nuclear power."
Let's see - you had Bush at the helm for 7 years, a Republican Congress for 6 of those years and STILL nukelear (as W would say) has gone nowhere.
Based on that alone, I'd continue to short nuke stocks if I were you.
Reality Check: You might want to check out the number of nuclear applications wending their way through the system...we are go for launch!
You might also take a look at the forward resistance tat those applications are going to receive, and how not one of them will impact N. California. This is a dead technology, anywhere there are thinking people.
Reality Check Squared:
"You might want to check out the number of nuclear applications wending their way through the system...we are go for launch!"
And when the Democrats win the Presidency next year, that "launch" will be scrubbed well before take-off.
Nuclear is here and now. If the Democrats win the WH in 2008 (starting to look doubtful, but still possible), they will slit their own throats if they further delay nuclear. Mass unemployment and possible riots in the street are not good for the Dems, if it happens under their watch. Hillary, for one, is smart enough not to delay nukes (although she will try cover her tracks with big new research funds for solar, wind, etc.). Base load electrical energy will become one of the major national issues during the next 10 years. The Dems cannot afford to be behind the curve on this one, or they will cease to exist as a political party.
Tarditas et procrastinatio odiosa est.
Greg, I'm sure the Dems are listening to your every word. (nudge, nudge)
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Draeger’s Los Altos eyes upgrades, expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,024 views
Housing is for People
By Steve Levy | 27 comments | 2,023 views
College Visit: Lehigh and Lafayette
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 4 comments | 1,387 views
"the Summit" (CompPlan): Forewarned is Forearmed
By Douglas Moran | 20 comments | 682 views
A quiet moment
By Sally Torbey | 8 comments | 581 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.