Town Square

Post a New Topic

Editorial: Palo Alto utilities need closer watch

Original post made on Sep 20, 2007

No greater or more concentrated effort to change a huge component of Palo Alto city government has ever been made than in the past two years in the city's vast Utilities Department.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 12:00 AM

Comments (7)

Posted by Willitz, a resident of Crescent Park
on Sep 20, 2007 at 4:39 pm

Palo Alto utilities isn't the only place that needs closer oversite- how about that agency that is supposed to watch over San Francisquito Creek. They've had [portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff] for years and little has been done about it on any level.

Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of Midtown
on Sep 20, 2007 at 5:59 pm

We need to dump this green foolishness and get back to what a utility is all about. Ms. Fong is all sizzle and no steak. It is time for the Tumbrils to roll. It is not all Fong's or Frank's fault, it is foolish directives by a council with stars in their eyes and lead in their butts. I see nothing better in the new candidates, alas.

Posted by Mike, a resident of College Terrace
on Sep 20, 2007 at 9:52 pm

It would be prudent for Council to at least *consider* a sale of the utility. It might not be a good idea, but it also *might* generate enough capital to insure a municipal revenue trust that would deliver just as much to the General Fund as the utility does, with enough left over to pay for some badly needed infrastructure and a substantial solar retrofir of a significant (if not all) of our community.

Just imagine:

1.Steady General Fund revenue

2.Infrastructure paid for (roads, library/rec center, public safety building, etc

3.*Additional* income genreated from Palo Alto homes that feed surplus electricity back to the grid

Posted by Hire more employees, a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Sep 20, 2007 at 10:53 pm

Sell the utilities and do what we do best. Hire more city employees. Give bigger pensions to hard working city employees - they deserve it.


Posted by His name is Ulrich, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 21, 2007 at 12:13 am

Seems Mr Wallis has forgotten the name of the long time Utilities manager who oversaw all the corruption and abuse. John Ulrich was the "golden boy" of the city manager. Everyone stood at attention when he spoke. His name is John Ulrich, Mr Wallis, in case you have forgotten.

Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of Midtown
on Sep 21, 2007 at 6:38 am

Ulrich was then, Fong is now. My criticism of Ulrich when he was relevant is a matter of record. Our oh so green council has not seen fit to respond to an earlier suggestion of mine, that they lead the nation in substituting teleconferencing for the out of town meetings that take up so much management time. Look for them to, instead, start buying carbon offsets for official travel. At least we know they will insist on genuine organic offsets. I sometimes think the entrances to the city need Golden Arches.

Posted by pete, a resident of Professorville
on Sep 21, 2007 at 2:40 pm

It seems from anecdotal stories and recent reported incidents that Ms. Fong is unable to "root out the culture of lax management..." to quote the PAW editorial. The vast majority of employees deserve better than they've been given. Mr. Benest, Ms. Harrison, and Mr. Yeats where is your oversight?

The union should take substantial responsibility for "...the deeply rooted culture". It defends a few bad apple employees and ignores the interests of the many who work in a "prison-like hostile work environment".

If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

The dress code
By Jessica T | 23 comments | 1,998 views

September food and drink goings on
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,392 views

Two Days to Save This Dog?
By Cathy Kirkman | 15 comments | 1,265 views

It Depends... Disguising Real Characters in Fiction
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 414 views

Twenty-five years of wedded bliss
By Sally Torbey | 0 comments | 64 views