Town Square

Post a New Topic

City taps Napa veteran as top planner

Original post made on Sep 10, 2013

Palo Alto has chosen a new planning director, tapping the top planning official at Napa County for one of the city's most challenging and prominent positions.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, September 10, 2013, 4:41 PM

Comments (22)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Pay
a resident of College Terrace
on Sep 10, 2013 at 5:22 pm

Yeah, Palo Alto is hurting financially. They cut all employees salaries and benefits (except for management that is). Then hire a planning director at almost $200,000 plus benefits per year.

Am I the only one seeing a problem here?!?!?!?!?!!?!? Screw fire, police, and other employees who are easily replaced and hire MORE managers who make more than double what the worker bees make.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Robert
a resident of Adobe-Meadows
on Sep 10, 2013 at 5:24 pm

$96 an hour plus benefits to sit in an upper tier office in Palo Alto and tell other people what to do.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by neighbor
a resident of another community
on Sep 10, 2013 at 7:00 pm

She is extremely qualified for this position.

And, given the contentious outbursts over every single planning issue in Palo Alto --- major and minor --- she deserves every penny of her salary.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 10, 2013 at 7:27 pm

This woman from her background appears to bring to Palo Alto City
government exactly the perspective that is so lacking here. She appears to be an excellent choice and represents a hopeful sign.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Welcome news
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 10, 2013 at 9:21 pm

This is welcome news from Mr. Keene and CIty Hall

How did Council manage to not screw it up.

Everything about her background sounds ideal for the serious issues the City is facing with the onslaught of development. This CIty is being curated by developers, and it is being destroyed.

I wish the new director the best.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 10, 2013 at 9:27 pm

From her broad background and experience she appears to be an excellent choice. Give Manager Keene credit here for bringing in a fresh perspective. Now Mr. Keene get out of her way, and City Council/ARB/P&TC listen to her and don't let her believe that
she is simply there to rubber-stamp what you already have in mind.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Scott Dusenberg
a resident of Downtown North
on Sep 11, 2013 at 5:36 am

Let me get this straight, we are routinely talking about cutting the budget and cutting staff, then we add management specialists, the EOC staff and interns, and now this lady for a combined total of over $1,000,000 in salaries? Wowzers...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Sep 11, 2013 at 5:44 am

Uh oh. Another reminder to our high school students of why it is imperative to attend Yale or Columbia or equivalent.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by AR
a resident of College Terrace
on Sep 11, 2013 at 10:15 am

This is not a $197k ADD to the City's budget; Curtis Williams was not working for free and his position had to be replaced. This woman's credentials are impressive and it may well be that she will value and endeavor to protect that which is dear to Palo Alto.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wilkommen
a resident of Community Center
on Sep 11, 2013 at 11:08 am

Good luck to her...she is certainly going to earn her pay with this city!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Rex Stults
a resident of another community
on Sep 11, 2013 at 11:45 am

Napa County's loss is Palo Alto's gain. I've had the great pleasure of interacting with Hillary Gitelman regularly on wine industry, land use and environmental issues over the past 8 years. She is a true pro. Extremely smart, very dedicated and very open. She is a terrific communicator and the people of Palo Alto will benefit from this hire. Her shoes will be tough to fill here in Napa Valley.

Rex Stults
Napa Valley Vintners


 +   Like this comment
Posted by OY!
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Sep 11, 2013 at 2:41 pm

Oh well, it's only $200,000 a year (+ $50,000 in benefits). Just add another position onto Keene's already bloated "shadow organization" of management personel. Who cares that it now costs the city in excess of $20+ million dollars a year in management salaries and benefits alone. Who cares that the city guarantees that these management employees will continue to receive a six figure retirement income thanks to the generous Palo Alto taxpayers. Who cares that Keene has hired yet another one of his close friends onto his senior management staff. Oh well......


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wilkommen
a resident of Community Center
on Sep 11, 2013 at 3:27 pm

Hey, truly good help does not come cheap! This lady is good at what she does, experienced, scandal-free, and she is going to have a very full plate when she gets here. Besides, $200,000/year does not go very far if she plans to live in Palo Alto.

[Portion removed.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sandy
a resident of Crescent Park
on Sep 11, 2013 at 4:36 pm

Why does Palo Alto feel the need to spend our hard earned money on yet another management position. I don't care how qualified she or he are, it isn't right. The City keeps raising our fees for garbage, water, recycling, etc. They raised our fees on street sweeping and cut our service to 1/2. As always the City does not think things through. They always put the cart before the horse and then realized that maybe they shouldn't have done that. Give the money to the police and fire department who work so hard for us.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Downtown North
on Sep 11, 2013 at 5:39 pm

It's a key job, let's see how she does.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Planning
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 11, 2013 at 5:41 pm

@OY! and Sandy and Dusenberg: Read the article; this isn't a new position. She's replacing someone in a position that is critical to the future of the city, what with all the construction projects going now and on the drawing boards.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sharon
a resident of Midtown
on Sep 11, 2013 at 6:58 pm



Napa = Palo Alto ?

As chalk = cheese

This very bad choice will = a very bad outcome for Palo Alto tax payers


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Planning
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 11, 2013 at 8:35 pm

@Sharon: Read the article; she worked for San Francisco and the Presidio Trust in significant positions.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Welcome news
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 12, 2013 at 9:08 am

Sharon,

Napa sounds great, combined with the Presidio Trust work. She understands nature, and what a tree means. I just hope she will keep that in mind at all times because her job will be to handle an onslaught of projects dead set on making Palo Alto into a depot of ugly office buildings.

I hope she's starting ASAP.



 +   Like this comment
Posted by good news
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 12, 2013 at 10:44 am

She also has a degree in art history. It will be nice to have
somebody in City Hall who understands and cares about aesthetic
values. This appointment has the look of a sea-change in Palo Alto.
On her first tour of Palo Alto she will be shocked at what she sees.





 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sharon
a resident of Midtown
on Sep 12, 2013 at 6:26 pm



Carly Fiorina, the former HP CEO-- also had a degree in art history

Bad decision-terrible outcome


This very bad choice will = a very bad outcome for Palo Alto tax payers


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Juno
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 13, 2013 at 10:08 am

If she is given an opportunity speak on Monday, I hope she doesn't say what a great "opportunity" this position is, or I will have to fight the urge to barf, and I will immediately form a negative impression.

I am wondering why she left what seems to me like a "better" position to come to Palo Alto. Wouldn't Napa County match the salary to keep her if she's so great? And housing is so high cost here. (Web says Napa County has 131,000 residents, compared with Palo Alto's 61,200). Of course, there are good explanations, such as a spouse/partner that works in Silicon Valley. I'm just wondering.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

I Told My Mom She's Dying
By Chandrama Anderson | 12 comments | 2,528 views

Grab a Bowl of Heaven soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,863 views

Quick Check List for UC Applications
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,246 views

Campaign Endorsements: Behind the Curtain
By Douglas Moran | 3 comments | 791 views

Mothers, daughters, books, and boxes
By Sally Torbey | 2 comments | 210 views