A good trade-off?
Original post made by Tyler Hanley, digital editor of Palo Alto Online, on Jul 11, 2006
Are the additional parking spaces (about 100) for downtown shoppers a good trade-off for allowing a larger building than the current zoning allows?
Or should the city council pass up the parking and let Keenan go forward with just a two-story building?
How do you feel about these "public benefit" projects where more development is allowed in exchange for parking or other benefits?
See story at Web Link
Employees-turned-owners revamp Cafe Alto, open new restaurant
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 3,392 views
New York City College Tours, Part Two: NYU, CUNY Baruch, and NYIT
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,570 views
Reducing Congestion and Parking Challenges While Respecting the Mobility Advantages of Cars
By Steve Levy | 12 comments | 1,974 views
Backlash Begins Following Serra Canonization Announcement
By Nick Taylor | 13 comments | 1,145 views
Council Priorities 2015: Honesty, Focus, and Listening about Listening
By Douglas Moran | 9 comments | 901 views