On the 'Rrrun' Around Town, posted by Samuel James Moore, a member of the El Carmelo School community, on Jul 9, 2006 at 12:57 pm
I saw the piece of art called Rrrun near my dentist's office. It is on Alma, by the park. It is very cool and it is big. I like that it is half human, half car. People should go and see it. I like this artist's sculptures. I looked at her website at www.mthoma.com.
Posted by A wise man from Menlo Park, a resident of Menlo Park, on Jul 10, 2006 at 2:10 pm
If there's one thing I can't stand now about California Avenue -- and I used to love California Avenue -- it's that weird "sculpture" of the giant head with legs.
Calling it a sculpture is giving it far more dignity than it deserves. The thing is bizarre, meaningless and unpleasant. It intrudes, bringing its message of absurdity and just plain wackiness to what used to be an easy going street. Garbage. If it were legal to do so, I'd be first in line to volunteer to haul it off to the junkyard, which is where it belongs. I'd be embarassed if I lived or worked on that street.
In seeing that ridiculous looking car sculpture in Friday's Palo Alto Weekly, I suspected that I would finally learn who made that object on California Avenue, and I was right. God!
I'm not an artist and I know it. The woman who made these objects outght to take up another profession.
Posted by Concerned Resident, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Jul 10, 2006 at 5:14 pm
People previously on the Arts Commission should not be paid for their art by the same Art Commission simply because it leads to a sense of improper behavior. Furthermore, when most people's reactions to the two pieces are so negative, it makes everybody wonder. As the article said, nobody wanted to pay $40K for it. Why should the city of Palo Alto pay for it at its discounted $18K price?
Given that it is now owned by the City, I suggest that it be sold on Ebay and that the funds be used for other art projects. I wonder how high the bid for this thing would go!
Two art work pieces by the same ex-Arts Commissioner artist is also extreme. I suggest that in the future the so called Arts Commission do a competition, not to scale models can be exhibited in some in-doors or out-doors public space and after discarding the most heavily opposed and most agreed upon hideous pieces they choose among the remaining ones.
I hope not to ever have to see more City funds go to this artist.
Posted by Bewildered, a resident of the Old Palo Alto neighborhood, on Jul 10, 2006 at 5:50 pm
I could not believe my eyes, I cried with joy, what an astonishingly marvelous gift from heaven, I no longer can see any other art work without it being diminished by this spirit awakening, earth shatering life transcending experience. I can now die in piece, I have seen it all.... NOT !!!
Only self-annointed artists and Art Con Missioners. That is what I really see. I suggest the artist take its rock bottom $18,000 worth of art sell it for $40,000 and pocket the difference and spare us the sight. Given that it was so, so, SOOOO CHEAP, he should not have any trouble finding lots of willing buyers!
Posted by Bella, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Jul 10, 2006 at 7:58 pm
I think "Rrrun" is beautiful, whimsical and a very intersting piece of art. If you had read the article in the Weekly, you would realize that is it neither meaningless nor garbage, as "A wise man" (ha!) from Menlo Park claims it to be. Besides, if you had even an ounce of creativity or innovation in you, you'd be able to see that it is not meaningless garbage on your own. But since you seem to be severely lacking in both, you and those like you will never be able to appreciate a sculpture like "Rrrun" because the only art you will ever appreciate is that which can be immediately comprehended in comparison. How sad.
Posted by Jackie, a resident of the Old Palo Alto neighborhood, on Jul 11, 2006 at 8:20 am
I find myself wondering who is making these expensive decisions about the local art and often wish that there was a way for the public to vote on a particular piece of work that we are going to be subjected to in our daily commutes before it is paid for and installed. But this is the first time that an example of 'art' has moved me to comment. This sculpture is NOT art. I think it is hideous, ugly. I would not miss it if it was removed.
Posted by Palo Alto Resident, a resident of the Fairmeadow neighborhood, on Jul 11, 2006 at 12:34 pm
I haven't seen the Rrrun sculpture. I do like the rag doll on California Street. But, I dislike the sculpture on Page Mill & El Camino Real at the new soccer field. (They took it down for a while, and I was relieved at the time -- erroneously thinking that it was being removed permanently.)