Town Square

Post a New Topic

Man who tried to run over police officer pleads 'no contest'

Original post made on Apr 17, 2013

An East Palo Alto man who tried to run over a police officer and deliberately smashed a stolen vehicle into a police van in East Palo Alto pleaded no contest to assault with a deadly weapon and other felonies on Tuesday, April 16, in San Mateo County Superior Court.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, April 17, 2013, 9:57 AM

Comments (7)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wondering?
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 17, 2013 at 10:26 am

Anyone know what difference a "no contest" plea makes in this situation, compared to a "guilty" plea?

Given the nature of this young man's actions--it's difficult to understand why he was not sentenced to more time.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Raymond
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Apr 17, 2013 at 11:14 am

@ 'Wondering'; a 'guilty' plea would admit guilt for a potential Civil suit brought by the Police officer.

Same as No contest plea for 'wreckless driving' when damages to personal property are at stake.

I'm not a lawyer


 +   Like this comment
Posted by CrescentParkAnon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 17, 2013 at 11:34 am

I sure would like to think that any person who tried to deliberately run over anyone, let along a police officer in the line of duty, would never live to see any light from the sun that was not filtered through prison bars. This is someone none of us want to ever have to worry about.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jared Bernstein
a resident of Professorville
on Apr 17, 2013 at 11:48 am

Wow, sounds like a defendant who had a mighty good lawyer. If this deal was worked out by a public defender, I'd like to know which on. This is great defense work, and I'm glad we have such effective public servants. (No irony intended here; it's a great outcome for young Mr. Livingston.) From the headline, I was SURE that it was some wealthy person who got off light due to the diligence of a well paid attorney. Apparently not so, but it'd be good to know.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Abe Mitchell
a resident of Meadow Park
on Apr 17, 2013 at 11:55 am

This is the sort of "Nutter" that deserves to be put in the dungeon with the door closed,locked and the key thrown away. However as society is today such things would be seen to be extremely cruel by the "Do-gooders" so no doubt he shall serve time at the tax-payers expense and be released as a rehabilitated person until the next time.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by jam
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Apr 18, 2013 at 8:20 am

These idiots who don't respect the police, get leniant sentences, and are a menace to our comunity and should be locked up for longer time. He will probably be paroled next summer and be ready to comit many more crimes in the comunity.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jeff
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Apr 18, 2013 at 2:37 pm

Attempted to run over two officers who were on foot but got less than 5 years? I didn't know police officers were so expendable. The difference in punishment between attempting and succeeding must be much larger than I would expect.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 3,039 views

WUE makes out-of-state tuition more affordable
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 2 comments | 2,795 views

Ode to Brussels Sprout
By Laura Stec | 18 comments | 2,384 views

Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,811 views

A Surprise!
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 952 views