Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Apr 9, 2013
...rezoning happy so-and-so's ... grrr ... Alma Plaza ....
Maybe we should make a rule that if city council wants to rezone ANYTHING they should have to get out of their offices and knock on doors in the area. And listen. And actually care about what those affected by the changes think.
NOW they want to save retail? How about putting some high density housing there? isn't that the most important thing of all in Palo Alto, more important than quality of life for existing residents, more important than safety, revenue, open space, daylight, property values, traffic jams, environmental degradation from the traffic jams, keeping services local. I thought the only thing that mattered was foisting higher density anywhere possible. Retail? Why not a whole bunch of 100 square foot apartments where we can shoe-horn in as many people as possible? I know, let's make it a senior development so no one can argue with it! Yes! Go high-density!
Oh, you mean more ice cream stores and nail salons.
What about some decent affordable retail? What about a decent, full service supermarket in Palo Alto. What about affordable children's clothes and household items? Why do I give most of my sales tax $$$ to Mountain View and elsewhere?
Big developers Chop Keenan and Roxy Rapp were against it so of course Klein, Price, and Shepherd were against it too. No surprises there.
@Resident, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
what, you want socialism? :)
City council members Price, Shepard and Klein lick the boots of developers. These three city council members need to be investigated
for possible kickbacks, favors, etc. by developers. Something doesn't smell right. They do not have the best interests of Palo Altans at heart, by virtue of their voting record.
It's high time to have an independent auditor examine the backgrounds and ALL ( not just reported ) income of Price, Shepard and Klein.
If improper income or behavior is found, THEY get the bill for the audit.
A grand " experiment " has failed and the zoning should reflect the wants of RESIDENTS and not profiteers.
Rapp and Keenan are generals in the War on Residents. Anything those guys oppose has to have some merit.
One maybe-less-obvious problem with the explosion of office space in Palo Alto is: it makes it harder to argue with ABAG (a train wreck in its own right) about overdevelopment in housing, at the same we're overdeveloping ourselves in office space.
As for Price and Shepard ... what would those two do if we ever had an issue pitting developers against public-employee unions?
It often appears like there is an ulterior motive to turn Palo Alto into one big urban center, rather than a nice residential suburb.
It is becoming less and less appealing as a place to live, as it gets more and more urbanized. far more people now work here than live here. More and more of the people who live here are crammed into undesirable high-density condos, townhomes, and apartments. Even the single family detached dwellings are on teeny tiny lots. New commercial and residential buildings get more and more drab, ugly, and in your face, for that closed-in canyon-like feeling. Less landscape and green space, more concrete and steel.
Not a place to raise children, or even walk a dog.
Roxy Rapp's Cheesecake Factory on University Ave is nearing it's 10-year anniversary. Almost exclusively found in malls it found its way unfettered onto University Ave, agendized originally by the staff as a "facade remodel" for ARB review and approval.That pretty much sums it up. It replaced a retail use, Copeland's Sports in the "downtown core".
It's laughable that Chop Keenan and Roxy Rapp are complaining about "spot zoning" when they are the major beneficiaries from that form of "spot zoning" known as "planned community". As usual follow the money, the truth is that they can get more dollars from an office building and stick residents with the increased traffic, parking and overall lower quality of living in Palo Alto.
I know right? Its almost like Palo Alto is smack dab in the middle of a large urban center. And clearly nobody wants to live in high density housing, that's why it never gets built, because it will just sit empty.
I don't enjoy walking around Palo Alto downtown anymore, it's so much traffic, construction, hectic....... Los Altos downtown is much nicer for lunch & walk around instead.
I don't think there's anything ulterior at all about the motive.
Planning Department officials have consistently been open about their vision to "urbanize" (their word) Palo Alto, with high density housing, higher-rise development, and "new urban" style projects unencumbered by parking and sidewalks.
Never mind this is completely contrary to the vision of Palo Alto residents and voters, to zoning laws, as well as to that annoying "Comprehensive Plan" thingy.
The City Staff thinks they've outgrown Palo Alto, and are Regional people now. Besides, it looks better on their resume that they put up an Arillaga-plex, as opposed to fixing potholes in the streets.
Right now office space is hot, the need for office space is huge, yes controls are needed. Can't have everything turn into office space, but can't have empty buildings waiting for retail tenants. Unless you want nail shops, check cashing, tanning salons. I have been some strip malls where those 3 kinds of stores are popular.
Only allow a percentage of offices to fill up space on any given retail block. Ground Floor.
If retail shops want to relocate to the 2nd floor, allow that to happen too.
Oh Well.....The City Council, City Manager, and Senior Management staff have long ago sold out to developers and commercial land owners with "their" vision of an "urbanized " Palo Alto. This council action will surely follow what the city manager calls "a need for a blue ribbon committee action" with months and months of outsourced contractor studies to examine what other cities are enforcing and followed by more studies and inaction. Maybe the only real purpose of city management and city council is to decide which flag to fly at city hall or if we should use plastic bags. We currently have a city manager with no leadership skills and a city council oblivious to resident needs. What a pity!
That's not completely true. Karen Holman gets it. The rest ...
Isn't Anna Eshoo's office on the ground floor of that block?
I think Karen Holman should let her know that "There's a place for offices, but in these kinds of locations it's not in the best interests of the community."
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,601 views
Politics: Empty appeals to "innovation"
By Douglas Moran | 13 comments | 1,587 views
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 1,513 views
Best High Dives to Watch the Game
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 1,094 views
It's Dog-O-Ween this Saturday!
By Cathy Kirkman | 2 comments | 794 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2014 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.