Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Jan 2, 2013
Hands free texting law is a huge let down to people concerned with safe driving. I see dozens of people on cell phones driving EVERY day so it seems like back pedaling, or adding loopholes to driving laws that are barely enforced in the first place. California and Palo Alto do not seem overly concerned about keeping our roads sage.
I just wish that people used blinkers before turning or changing lanes.
What a crock ... the whole thing with using devices while driving is all about judgement and skill, and there is really no way to legislate that.
Hands free stuff you still have to reach over and press a button, a button that is sometimes hard to find and takes your eyes off the road. For example Apple's SIRI is hands free .. but you have to press the button to activate it, and then often you have to read and press a choice it returns back to you.
People are still driving while "gadgeting" and even if they do not get in accidents, they still slow everyone down and add to stress by driving too slow, being unaware, sitting at lights when they turn green and making bad decisions while driving because they are not full concentrating on what they are doing.
Either fix the technology or ban it ... or better yet, just let everyone do whatever they want to do and come down on them massively hard when they screw up so they can learn their lesson. A lot of people can use these things, smoke, eat, change the radio channel, switch CD's or whatever and not have a problem.
I know how, when and where to do whatever it is I have to do when I drive and I have yet to hit anyone or even get a ticket. I'm not perfect, but I have reasonable judgement and know at any given moment where my attention needs to be ... like on driving when my car is moving. I don't know why we all cannot manage that, but making and changing and re-making all these laws constantly seems to me to be a big damn waste of time and effort that does not solve the problem.
Maine has a hand distracted driving law. This means doing anything with your hands other than driving e.g. eating, shaving, putting on make up, drinking, etc. as well as using electronic devices.
Makes lots of sense too.
I am very disappointed in this new texting law. One problem is that many people don't understand what is meant by "hands-free". Apparently many people think that putting it on speakerphone qualifies. I have seen several people hold a phone in their hands while talking and claim that it is hands-free!
And, how does a police-officer know you were just touching the phone to activate hands-free functions?
I can just see the amount of people getting out of tickets.
I would've liked to see higher fines for any cell-phone use - or just change the law like the comment above, to what Maine has. Seems every person thinks they have it down, to be able to multitask while driving, even 'Anon', above, believe they have mastered their own domain in their car.
<State law already allowed hands-free verbal calling, but the new one makes it legal to use software applications to dictate texts or listen to incoming written texts that the device "reads" aloud, Clader said.
"This allows you to use any voice-activated device so you don't have to type to text," Clader said.
Under the law, drivers will be allowed to touch their phones to activate or deactivate the hands-free functions.>
Anymouse1 > even 'Anon', above, believe they have mastered their own domain in their car.
Hey Anymouse1 ... it is not that I "believe" I have mastered it ... not that I blame you for being skeptical, for me I have the numbers ... I have been ticket and accident free for many years. I am not perfect, but as I state, this is really a question of judgement, and most people do not know when to engage it, or perhaps even how.
It's a good point about making a law that is problematic to enforce, and I think it is the game our current crop of politicians play ... they make sucker laws that are useless, based on one or two cases played to the public to make it look like they are doing something ... when the real problems in our city, state and country grow rampantly out of control.
Having had an iPhone for years now, I can tell you that the hands-free that I used on my iPhone now ... is inferior to just being able to pick up my old Nokia in:
1. the old phones has one lit up spot ... the number ... so you did not have to look and take time and brain bandwidth to orient to the screen.
2. the old phones had individual buttons that beeped when you pressed them, giving you feedback as to what you dialed. The hole face of my iphone feels the same.
3. The speakerphone feature is nice, but my old Motorola phone had that.
4. Manipulating other featuers of the phone forces more attention off driving. not less.
That's just my opinion and I'm sure the new phones will get better, but still, this is just laws to be able to stop and harrass people ... I sincerely doubt their effectiveness in anything. Are their ticket statistics that infractions or accidents have gone down? I bet scratch the surface of that and it is total horse puckey ... or should I say malarchy?
The idea of a traffic, red light camara sounds more like, a revenue use then for a safety measure. It's too bad.
Many young people raised in the age of instant chatter are addicted to texting and smartphones. No law or fine will stop this.
But there is an easy fix and I suggested a new law to Jerry Hill.
Smartphones with GPS chips can be programmed within the operating system to not allow texting anytime the phone is traveling above a given speed. Or they could require a nuisance prompt for each text sent and received just as current GPS devices in cars.
We didn't NEED to text while driving 20 years ago. We don't NEED to today. Pull over in a safe place to call or text. 911 would still work for emergencies.
Movie theaters vigorously enforce no talking or texting. Why can't we enforce this while driving.
Insurance companies, parents of teenagers, and many other groups would back a law that would totally stop texting while driving.
The cell phone laws are a good economic stimulus plan. Sounds like many of you need a new phone, and/or a new car. I get in my Toyota, the Bluetooth auto-connects, and I have hands free everything: texting, navigation, and calls. Admittedly, I do have to push a button on my steering wheel if I want to listen to my playlists off my phone, but they're easy to find and I don't have to look away from the road. I remember my dad changing 8-tracks in the car back in the day while we had lap belts and kids sat in plastic buckets. I'm pretty sure things are safer now; people are just dumber.
If you don't run red lights, you don't have to worry about cameras.
Jim, I don't know if it's feasible, but I very much like your idea of having the phone be "smart" enough to know it's moving faster than a human can walk and just not work!
On a visit to Portugal, local friends kept alluding to how bad the drivers there are, and maybe they are, I don't know, but I felt so much safer as a pedestrian in Lisbon because drivers just didn't seem to ever run red lights or even push it. I asked a friend why this was and he said it's because if you run a red light, they take away your license. They also seem to have a much bigger zone at the intersection for cars to leave clear for pedestrians.
The most dangerous driving I've seen is women applying makeup while they are driving, even at freeway speeds. This ought to be illegal. That, and, well, teenagers driving while texting and wandering into opposing lanes of traffic. Oh, and people on cell phones running red lights. I'm with the 'distracted hands' suggestion above. And maybe for a little bit of tough love ala the Portugese for persistent red light runners.
Clever idea about phones not working while moving, but one of the advantages of public transit is that you can use your phone while on a bus or train. Likewise, car pooling.
> having the phone be "smart" enough to know it's moving faster than a human can walk and just not work!
Guess if I'm kidnaped and in the trunk of a car with my cellphone I won't be able to call police and let them know?
Talk about crazy things to do when you are driving ... I'll never forget a guy in a van playing the trumpet, with both hands, while he was driving in traffic on 101.
I do NOT believe in driving with gadgets! IT IS NOT SAFE..for you AND all of the rest of us folks. Cars go fast, very heavy vehicles and you get horrid injuries and ones that can ruin your life.
Don't do it.
Just pull over for a bit in a parking lot or something.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Teavana Palo Alto closes
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 3,487 views
What Freshmen Should be Thinking About College
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 10 comments | 1,945 views
Sometimes the Rules Go Out the Window
By Cheryl Bac | 5 comments | 1,713 views
Clarifying the Process of Canonization
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 1,134 views
Waiting on the Edge of Death
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 599 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.