Elks Lodge Development Takes Heat
Original post made by JW on Aug 18, 2007
Why is it that members of the ARB, most of whom live in North Palo Alto, approved SummerHills Development of detached houses around Heritage Park in North Palo Alto? But, when a similar development is proposed for South Palo Alto, the ARB is demanding smaller units of dense affordable housing.
I suppose they feel a dense development is appropriate for South Palo Alto, but elegant detached homes are for North Palo Alto only.
Doesn't the ARB realize that the more units you build brings additional students into our over-crowded schools?
With the Vantage, BRIDGE/BUILD, the Campus for Jewish Life, and Rickey's Developments, isn't South Palo Alto taking on more than its share of dense affordable housing? And, since the Elks Lodge site is next door to the dense housing being built on the Rickey's Hyatt site, I think it is entirely appropriate that the 43 detached homes be approved for the Elks Lodge site.
If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
On Tour at Selective Schools: Chapman, La Verne, Redlands, Whittier
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,857 views
. . . People will never forget how you made them feel.
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,111 views
It Depends... Disguising Real Characters in Fiction
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 371 views