Town Square

Post a New Topic

Deception -- or alternate business model?

Original post made on Oct 18, 2012

Local residents have been caught in a five-year debate over the activities of one man, a real-estate investor named Jason Buzi.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, October 10, 2012, 1:24 PM

Comments (19)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by No-thanks
a resident of South of Midtown
on Oct 18, 2012 at 4:04 pm

OK Jason, hope you are reading this. Enough. No more fliers, letters, fed ex envelopes with ready to sign contracts. We know how to contact you if we want to sell. So stop with the mass marketing.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Journalism
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 18, 2012 at 4:45 pm

I'm a bit surprised that the reporter didn't do a little more digging about Mr. Buzi's activities. His outing as a spammer (Web Link ), his Cashtomato stunts (Web Link and (Web Link), his BBB rating of F (Web Link), he's listed at AccessBancMortgage in San Jose, and Pantera Group in Redwood City. He's somehow involved with Loanswift in San Jose.

Seems he's quite an active guy. The story needs fleshing out.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jan H.
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Oct 18, 2012 at 8:11 pm

We got a letter in the mail from this guy in February, claiming he had a buyer, a nice family, who wanted to buy our house and would pay top dollar. It sounded too fishy to be true, so I threw it in the recycling bin.

A couple of days later I had second thoughts and showed it to my husband, who laughed and said that if it were true, another letter would be forthcoming. So, I tossed it in the recycling bin a second time. After all this time, I never received anything else from this guy.

Did everyone in town get one of these letters, or what?






 +   Like this comment
Posted by Marliver
a resident of Mountain View
on Oct 23, 2012 at 11:42 pm

He's still around. And this week, he advises against his prospective sellers seeking an attorney to review his 'offers'.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by ducatigirl
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Oct 25, 2012 at 12:40 pm

ducatigirl is a registered user.

Sounds like he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by David Blockhus
a resident of Los Altos
on Nov 15, 2012 at 11:20 am

Here is a link to a post I did on a selling home to anyone who shows up on your doorstep - Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by David Blockhus
a resident of Los Altos
on Nov 15, 2012 at 11:24 am

Here is a video showing Jason talking about "wholesaling" which is why he is leaving flyers all over the bay area. According to Jason, it "only risk free way of buying real estate" note: its about 17 minutes long.

Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gordon
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Nov 6, 2013 at 9:16 am

Wholesaling homes is very legal. It is don't quite a bit in other parts of the U.S. where average price of homes is 50k. Agents don't make much money on homes at 50k or less so wholesalers sell them to end buyers.
Homes in the bay area are way too expensive so people get in an uproar if someone sells fast to the middle man who makes so money.
If you want a wholesale home , go to Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by annoyed
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 pm

got a letter from this guy today. letter with no return address. letter content is pretty condescending, to say the least.

scam artist. go somewhere else.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Concerned
a resident of another community
on Apr 14, 2014 at 8:39 pm

I received a letter from Jason Buzi today, (04-14-14) on a plain paper. No letter head. He stated he can offer all cash, no closing costs, no commission, no escrow fees, no title reports, no repairs, no costs of any kind. [Portion removed.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ptown2
a resident of another community
on Apr 16, 2014 at 10:29 pm

I too just received one of his 'letters'. He's annoying but don't think it is illegal. If I get another I'll consider it harrassment and will then report it to authorities


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Kay
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Apr 22, 2014 at 3:51 pm

I have been receiving his mailings for over 5 years. It is a nuisance, I get about 2-3 a year. It seems like a scam! I think he may be targeting older homes, ours is built 1932.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by pat R
a resident of Barron Park
on Apr 29, 2014 at 4:30 pm

i have received several letters from this guy and I'm a Realto he is false and mis-leading.
I want him to stop.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wondering
a resident of Mountain View
on Jun 6, 2014 at 8:18 pm

Plenty of Realtors were involved in shady loans, sales, and purchases during the lead up to the popping of the real estate bubble, and now have the gall to call out anybody?

What's property worth in MT View? Who knows?

Give me a break.

When at the carnival, count your change.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by watcher
a resident of Adobe-Meadows
on Jun 6, 2014 at 10:06 pm

[Post removed.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Scott
a resident of another community
on Jun 7, 2014 at 12:51 am

Buying and selling real estate without a broker is not illegal. In fact, there are several reasons that a seller might want to pursue a direct sale, including if their property is in poor condition. If your property is in poor condition, lenders will not lend on your property until it meets certain standards, essentially limiting your buyer pool to all cash buyers. An all cash sale is understandably and typically made at a discount, so it should not be a surprise that the sellers of these properties may not want to entertain the additional 6% brokers fee when they can negotiate directly with savvy all cash buyers.
If you are a seller trying to sell a property in poor condition, your options are:
Option #1:
Contact a broker:
1. Have them give you the long list of what needs to be done before they can/will market your property (lenders are fairly particular these days on what they will lend against)
2. Arrange and finance the necessary repair work that could cost you tens of thousands and weeks or months to complete.
3. Finally list the property and endure the open houses, offers, counter offers and hopefully obtain and accept a fair offer
4. Get nickeled and dimed after the buyer locks up your property in contract, completes their inspections, and finds more issues with the home that need to be repaired
5. Perform the additional repairs or credit the buyer to perform them after escrow closes
6. Hopefully close the deal and then pay a 6% commission to your broker
OR...
Option #2
1. Negotiate a fair price with a direct buyer and close in a week without having to deal with all of the crap associated with Option #1.
There is really no option for some sellers as they may not have the resources to pursue option #1. Granted, option #2 is not for everyone or every situation, but it is an option and there is absolutely nothing wrong or illegal about it. It does however cut out the brokers, who understandably take issue with this option. (Reference David Blockhus comments above)
As far as the marketing strategy is concerned, welcome to our capitalist society. I am sure most of us receive mail from Bed Bath & Beyond on a weekly basis. Does this mean that if their offerings do not appeal to us that they are harassing us to spend our money at their local venue and that we need to report them to the Police, or do we simply discard their offerings with the rest of our junk mail?
And finally, why are there no unsatisfied customers expressing their dismay at this person's business practices or ethics? Why do the only folks speaking out here seem to be brokers or folks that don't like his marketing strategy?
Things that make you go ...hmmmm
Scott
....a capitalist sympathizer






 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bob
a resident of Menlo Park
on Jun 7, 2014 at 6:37 am

You don't suppose that real estate agents and newspapers are only complaining because of the added competion do you? If they were truly interested in sellers getting top dollar dropping their commission would achieve that goal. And you'll never see newspapers write articles about 'corrupt' practices of those who provide the bulk of their advetising dollars. What Mr. Buzi is doing is offering a service to sellers who are under no obligation to accept. That isn't corrupt anymore than newspaper advertising.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Watcher
a resident of Adobe-Meadows
on Jun 7, 2014 at 8:21 am

Several of the local news stations are saying that he is the one hiding cash around San Francisco and San Jose. Here is a link in case you are interested in reading what they are saying Web Link

I have no idea of the validity, just passing on the info.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by David B
a resident of Los Altos
on Jun 9, 2014 at 11:02 am

David B is a registered user.

As Scott correctly points out, it is not illegal to to buy or sell real estate without a broker. It is an opportunity to avoid real estate commissions, but at what cost. If you are a home seller and live along the Peninsula and want to sell off market or directly to an individual who leaves a flyer on your doorstep, you are taking money directly out of your pocket and putting it directly into the investor's pocket. If you are comfortable with that, then go for it. Or if you are like most homeowner's who want to maximize the sale of your home and net the highest amount of money for yourself and you heirs, you will want to have as many qualified buyers see your home. The more qualified buyers who see your home the higher the sales price. Remember, it is a seller's market out there, but selling directly, you take away the benefits of it being a seller's market.

There is some inconvenience involved with selling your home. But again if you want to maximize your profit, you will want to go through this inconvenience. Depending on your home's condition, you may want to do some upgrading of its condition. But that must be weighed against the time, cost, and inconvenience of doing so. I just sold a home that was in original shape (built in the 1950's with no major upgrades). In discussion with the estate, we decided that we would only get inspections done on the property. No repairs or remodeling was done. The total cost of all these "expensive and time consuming" things that Scott says agent's demand...less than $1,000. and two days of actual inspection time.

After exposing it to the entire buyer community, we received 6 offers. Note: the property was bid up far above what we had hoped for and more than two of the offers were all cash. After weighing the pros and cons of each offer, the trustee for the estate chose to go with an offer that had a loan but 35% cash down. We could have negotiated the best all cash deal up to a higher price, but the trustee was comfortable with the qualifications of the buyer's offer they chose. There were no issues with the financing and we closed in 23 days (including the 3 day holiday). The buyer did not come back and nickel and dime us because, as is the case with a large percentage of sales done locally, the buyer came in with no contingencies (i.e. legal reasons to back out of the deal without penalty). So my seller received true fair market value for their home (6 offers) because it was exposed to the market and were quite happy. This is just one of many true life examples that selling a home that is fully exposed to the market makes the most sense for the seller.

After paying the real estate commissions and closing costs, the estate netted much more above the last sale in the neighborhood. So even by paying real estate commissions, they made a substantial profit above and beyond the last "comps" in the neighborhood.

If you are an investor like Mr. Buzi or Scott, you want to buy real estate at the lowest possible price and by purchasing directly from the homeowner, you are buying it at the lowest possible price. No buyer competition and when buyers compete for properties, prices go up.

One question you might ask a real estate investor is how do they sell the properties that they have invested in? My guess is when they sell, they want to have their investments shown to the most amount of qualified buyers....But that is just a guess.

By the way, I have nothing against real estate investors buying off market. If they can do it, more power to them. What I do have issues with is that it is somehow done to the benefit of the seller.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


To post your comment, please click here to Log in

Remember me?
Forgot Password?
or register. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Flirtation
By Chandrama Anderson | 4 comments | 1,555 views

King of the Slides
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 1,196 views

Standardized Test Prep: When to Start and Whom to Hire?
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 851 views

The Future of our Parks: Public Workshops this Week
By Cathy Kirkman | 0 comments | 593 views

Subverting open, fair and honest debate (Measure D)
By Douglas Moran | 5 comments | 585 views