Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES AROUND TOWN   BOOKS   CRIMES & INCIDENTS
  HISTORIC PHOTOS   ISSUES BEYOND PALO ALTO   MOVIES   PALO ALTO ISSUES
  RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   JAY THORWALDSON'S BLOG
  PAUL LOSCH'S COMMUNITY BLOG   REBECCA WALLACE'S AD LIBS BLOG   STEPHEN LEVY'S ECONOMY BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MAIN VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
Google fined $22.5M for privacy 'misrepresentations'
Around Town, posted by Editor, Palo Alto Online, on Aug 9, 2012 at 10:25 am

Google will be required to pay a $22.5 million penalty after the Federal Trade Commission charged the Mountain View-based Internet search giant with misrepresenting its privacy settings to its users.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, August 9, 2012, 9:55 AM

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by blame, a resident of the Adobe-Meadows neighborhood, on Aug 9, 2012 at 10:25 am

I blame Apple, not Google, for Apple's insecure web browser.


Posted by wow, a resident of the Charleston Meadows neighborhood, on Aug 9, 2012 at 11:16 am

Of course you do. Google's wilful and fraudulent misrepresentations are entirely beside the point. Why should Google be penalized for lying to the FTC. Just because Google circumvented apple's privacy settings is also beside the point.

The point is Apple is the culprit because...because... because you say so. Let's not let the facts stand in the way of who we want to blame.


Posted by Wondering?, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Aug 9, 2012 at 3:06 pm

Maybe it's too late to be asking this question, but what gives the FTC the power over the "planting of cookies" on my, or anyone's machines? Is there Federal legislation effectively declaring "cookies" some sort of "controlled substance"?

Or is the FTC off sticking its nose in somewhere it doesn't really have the authority to be?


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   


Best Website
First Place
2009-2012

 

Palo Alto Online   © 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.