Town Square

Post a New Topic

Around Town

Original post made on Jul 27, 2012

BEATING THE DEADLINE... Three new playing fields. A redesigned Baylands golf course with a "Wow" factor. New plazas and wider sidewalks on a soon-to-be two-lane California Avenue. A revised massage ordinance. A refreshed Cogswell Plaza. New contracts for workers represented by the city's largest labor union and by its police-managers union. These are just some of the big-ticket items the Palo Alto City Council green-lighted Monday in its final meeting before a month-long break. There was one item, however, that the council didn't get to during the seven-and-a-half-hour meeting: high-speed rail. Lawmakers were scheduled to consider endorsing a citizens' initiative to cut off future funding for the locally unpopular $68 billion project. Shortly before midnight, the council agreed to address the issue at its first meeting after the break. Even this proved to be a blessing in disguise. The two Republicans leading the initiative announced Wednesday that they are suspending their campaign for the revote. Former U.S. Rep. George Radanovich and current state Sen. Doug LaMalfa issued a statement on the campaign website that the initiative is suspended "while litigation brought against high-speed rail in Central Valley moves through the court system." They vowed, however, that the effort is not dead, just delayed for a while. Radanovich called the decision to suspend the campaign "a postponement of what I see as a future initiative allowing voters the opportunity to tell politicians in Sacramento that they don't want a California high-speed rail system plagued with budget overruns and repeated failure to meet every deadline."

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, July 27, 2012, 12:00 AM

Comments (5)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jul 27, 2012 at 2:49 pm

Another REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY on the Planning Commission and a highly competent expert booted out.
Burt, Scharff, and Klein are leaving their scars on the city and the developers can have a party. The 1 percenters take care of one another.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Fred Balin
a resident of College Terrace
on Jul 27, 2012 at 4:15 pm

Fred Balin is a registered user.

.. know almost nothing about the new P&TC members, yet am still shocked over the council's decision to not reappoint Susan Fineberg.

She was a model commissioner ...
... extremely intelligent
and dedicated
... always exceptionally prepared,
... fluent in the Comp Plan, Zoning Code, overarching statewide rules and legal constraints,
always asking thoughtful, relevant questions of staff and colleagues
... always interacting in the most respectful manner no matter how contentious an issue

Low key, while also clear and direct,

She took her role as a "chief inspector" for the council and representative of the public interest very seriously

She believed strongly in proper process, transparency, and inclusion ...

and she was her own person, not afraid to make to her own, best judgment

Maybe these were part of disappointing reasoning by which she was not reappointed: the desire for more malleable, quicker, pre-planned outcomes over thoughtful, studied, independent consideration

.. her departure over a series of votes, and until proven differently, rests unfavorably on this council.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by common sense
a resident of Midtown
on Jul 27, 2012 at 8:03 pm

Susan Fineberg was a commissioner who represented the residents of Palo Alto rather than the developers. Her most recent votes on the Lytton Gateway and other high density projects most likely irritated the developer crowd who are represented by Jim Baer. That's why a majority of the council voted Susan out. They don't like anyone on the Planning Commission asking tough questions - it puts the council on the spot.

Return the favor - don't vote for Pat Burt this November.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jul 28, 2012 at 4:02 pm

Susan Fineberg was a commissioner who represented the residents of Palo Alto ...
By appointing a REAL ESTATE ATTORNEY, Burt, Scharff (Real Estate attorney), and Klein (investment attorney) can be assured that developers will sail through the commission.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by PA Tax Payer
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 1, 2012 at 10:59 am

Three new soccer fields east of H.101 for whom? Whose going to use them, residents of EPA? And, Palo Alto will be paying for all this!! Meanwhile, it's revealed that the soccer fields at the corner of El Camino Real and Page Mill are left empty most of the time, nobody is using them because there's nowhere to park!!!

Another dumb, dumb, decision on the part of our out of touch CC.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Mixx, Scott's Seafood replacement, opens in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 14 comments | 3,601 views

To Cambodia With Love
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 3,050 views

Ten Steps to Get Started with Financial Aid
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 2 comments | 2,524 views

Life in fast forward
By Jessica T | 3 comments | 1,490 views

Early Campaign Notes: City Council
By Douglas Moran | 13 comments | 1,376 views