Posted by Mac Clayton, a resident of the Community Center neighborhood, on Jul 13, 2012 at 11:40 am
My hat is off to those of you who are willing to stay up late on Monday nights (and no doubt many other nights) to look after us. My personal wish list for you, Pat: ban leaf blowers of all types. They are noisy, dusty, and unnecessary; a particular curse if you work at home, as many of us do. Rakes and brooms work fine.
Posted by Leslie, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Jul 13, 2012 at 1:19 pm
My one disappointment with Pat Burt is he opposed a new Foothill College campus at Cubberley, a great opportunity missed.
It now transpires that the School District may not need the Cubberley site until the 2020s and only then if school enrollment continues to increase which it may or may not do. The School District's present building program will satisfy their enrollment needs for the next 5 - 7 years.
Posted by I'll pass this time, a resident of the Community Center neighborhood, on Jul 13, 2012 at 3:33 pm
Pat is a nice guy, but he's not leadership material. Burt is a perfect example of someone who would excel as a community volunteer; his heart is in the right place, but he just doesn't have what it takes to lead, or inspire.
Posted by Annette, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Jul 13, 2012 at 6:46 pm
I'd like to respond to the South of Midtown comment. I am flattered by your accolades, but I am only one of a team of fantastic and competent individuals who work together effectively to make our city more resilient.
To touch on a few points: Pat Burt has been a supporter of the PAN (Palo Alto Neighborhoods) EPrep efforts for years, as well as a supporter of the bigger issue of Public Safety for the City. Pat crafted the motion to make Emergency Preparedness a city priority for the last 3 years and has been an honored adviser to our efforts.
He has shown leadership in setting local policy and at the county level on the County Emergency Preparedness Council.
Pat has been very active with the JPA and the Santa Clara Valley Water District. Progress is being made. We have been lucky that the last few years have not caused flooding. He helped pave the way for multi-year grants with the SCVWD
One tidbit that demonstrates his character:
When we held the 2010 Citizen Corps Council annual awards ceremony and keynote, Pat opened and closed the program in a most eloquent and motivational fashion. It was only later that I found out that he turned down an invitation to meet with President Obama that night; he honored his commitment to our program.
Just because actions are not visible, please do not assume that Pat has not played a strong role in getting us where we are today.
Posted by common sense, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Jul 13, 2012 at 10:58 pm
I think Pat has done some good - he's generally been a voice of pushing for better fiscal planning and budgeting, and has been one of the drivers towards getting employee compensation on a more sustainable budgetary path.
Pat has good knowledge of zoning issues.
The negative on Pat is that he has blinders on when it comes to environmental issues, such as voting to endorse the High Speed Rail in 2008 because the Sierra Club endorsed it.
The other negative on Pat is that he is a little too cozy with the developer crowd, for example his recent support for the Lytton Gateway project, even though from his knowledge of zoning, he knows the project is way under allocated for parking.
Posted by He favors big development, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Jul 14, 2012 at 3:48 pm
Well stated, common sense:
<The other negative on Pat is that he is a little too cozy with the developer crowd, for example his recent support for the Lytton Gateway project, even though from his knowledge of zoning, he knows the project is way under allocated for parking.>
This affects the entire community; he is too cozy with developers. And too cozy with the other developer advocates, Klein and Scharff.