Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Mar 28, 2012
!@#! $%# %%^$ %% &$%#% @% @ !!!! I believe that all I have to say!!!
During the worst economic downturn we have witnessed in our lifetimes, politicians and planning commissions believe the populace can live with hugely increasing prices hikes on just about everything under the sun on a regular basis. I would like to meet a "typical" Palo Alto water user, as my neighbors and I have seen astronomical increases in the price of water over the last few years, and apparently, this is going to continue in perpetuity. Would that my bill was only going to increase by $8.54!
You forgot ##(&*%$!
The Utility Users Tax flows directly into the general fund, and is used to pay bloated salaries, pensions, and fund pet projects.
The tax needs to be repealed immediately, because as it stands, our supposed representatives, the city council, is incentivized to allow utility rates to increase as much as possible, as rate increases serve as a backdoor tax increase.
This is a structural form of corruption that must be addressed.
Not everyone in Palo Alto is a transplanted trillionaire or a pending dot-com zillionaire... what about those living on (minimal) social security? After working for many years, old people (especially women) are left with lifeline phone service and utility rate assistance (on gas and electricity only) plus a few medical benefits. Where are they going to get money to pay all these rate increases? Or, should they simply develop more interesting recipes using cat food and dandelion greens???
I'm tired of the City (the PAU in this case) using arcane units, such as CCF (Hundred Cubic Feet) as the measure of usage. All of us understand gallons, not CCF!
The following is the conversion equation:
CCF * 748 = gallons
How hard would it be to add a column to the pricing charts to provide the residents, and rate payers, with meaningful information? Given how ghastly expensive things are becoming in this town, don't people have a right to be treated with some respect?
Once again, no, no, no, no, no.
Instead of raising everyone's rate, why not add a surtax to new service (at newly built or significantly enlarged homes); swimming pool owners; spa owners; owners of golf course-sized lawns?
You could set the tax per bathroom or something, so that the regular 1 to 2.5 bathrooms that are the predominant number are at the current rate, and people who feel the need or have created the residential space for more would be charged at a higher rate.... in other words, do not punish and create hardship for the residents who already are having to stretch their budgets to accomodate a couple of other new rate increases, but only those whose behavior indicates that they can meet this new obligation with irritation perhaps, but without having to drop something equally as necessary as water to live.
OR, and this is just a mind-meandering question... Could it be that some, perhaps unspoken, mindset has taken over the city that subconsciously WANTS to drive the older, the poorer, the less affluent residents out?
Frankly, that is what is feels like on the receiving end these days.
I wonder how much of the budget shortfall is due to pension and benefits? What would City Council members do? Cut their own benefits? NOt a chance!
Here we go again. They will never tell you the truth!
This 'rate raising' seems to be a reoccurring theme this past year or so. And it is getting old. Time to start running this city like a business and quit passing inefficiencies and mismanagement costs onto the residents.
I am the City Utilities Communications Manager. For those readers who might want a deeper understanding about the factors affecting water, sewer, gas and electric rates, we have a web page with this kind of detail as well as an overview of what exactly you get for the dollars spent on your utilities. Rate changes for each utility are discussed. (Visit www.cityofpaloalto.org/utilities and you will see links to this information.)
In the case of water in particular, it's worth noting that the proposed rates not only cover Palo Alto's share of the costs for the upgrades to the Hetch-Hetchy water system, but also cover projects like our local emergency supply system rehabilitation. The latter will be a huge benefit to everyone in the event of a major disaster that even temporarily cuts us off from the Hetch-hetchy supply.
The next step for the water and sewer rate proposals will be revision (in consideration of input from the Utilities Advisory Commission) and then presentation to the City Council Finance Committee on April 18th. Revised versions will be posted to the website when available, which should be shortly before the Finance Committee meeting. email@example.com
Mss Katz said: " it's worth noting that the proposed rates not only cover Palo Alto's share of the costs for the upgrades to the Hetch-Hetchy water system, but also cover projects like our local emergency supply system rehabilitation."
In the event of a major disaster most likely all the ancient infrastructure that Palo Alto has, is going to be gone for good. The residents would do with their own water and food supplies stored at home or in their cars. The City Council fancy pet project named "local emergency supply system rehabilitation" is just smokes and mirrors and a good excuse to throw away Palo Altans tax money.
[Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]
The bottom line the public infrastructure supporting the water delivery as well as other public services in the city is ancient and most likely is not going to survive a major disaster. The Blind City Council spending priorities are a lil bit off.
I can't afford 35 percent increases in the water rate on a yearly basis, which is what seems to be in store for "heavy" water users, so reading all the benefits I am getting from paying exorbitant rates for utilities is of no real interest to me. I also somehow don't trust that ALL pertinent factors are going to be included on the web page. Utility users understand water is a scarce resource, but they also understand political factors, increasing operating costs and pensions, and revenue enhancement as considerations which will not be fully addressed in anything Palo Alto Utilities communicates.
The heck with water. I'm drinking straight from now on.
Cheers to you, Mr. Wallis! That actually might be a good remedy for all of this.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Woodland Ave. area (East Palo Alto)
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Sneak peek: Bradley's Fine Diner in Menlo Park
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,327 views
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,638 views
Politics: Empty appeals to "innovation"
By Douglas Moran | 13 comments | 1,604 views
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 1,530 views
It's Dog-O-Ween this Saturday!
By Cathy Kirkman | 2 comments | 817 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2014 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.