Group calls for more rail crossings, parks around Caltrain tracks Around Town, posted by Editor, Palo Alto Online, on Mar 2, 2012 at 9:52 am
For Palo Alto residents who live near the Caltrain corridor, the tracks are both a blessing and a curse -- a way to get around the Peninsula without cars and a barrier that restricts their ability to travel east and west.
Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, March 2, 2012, 8:49 AM
Posted by bill g, a resident of the Barron Park neighborhood, on Mar 2, 2012 at 10:39 am
Have any estimates been made as to the costs of the alternatives? All ideas most likely would involve removing existing homes by eminent domain. Such action adds greatly to the cost of any crossing - not to speak of local opposition.
Who pays for any of the proposed crossings? The City already has forecast a budget short fall for the next several years.
I think any fixed action would be premature until the final HSR plans are completed.
Posted by Other priorities, a resident of the Fairmeadow neighborhood, on Mar 2, 2012 at 11:50 am
I hope the "group" that is pushing for these changes is also willing to pay for them. I don't want to. We can't afford it. Who can honestly think we're not already paying enough already? It's got to stop! Necessities only!
Posted by James Baloun, a resident of the Charleston Meadows neighborhood, on Mar 2, 2012 at 12:39 pm
When considering corridor options it is useful to keep in mind the practical limitions of natural features such as elevation and waterways, and the limitations of the required clearances for pedestrians, cars, trucks, and of course the trains. There are ways to enhance the efficiency of a combined Caltrain / HSR corridor with the minimum of cost and materials.
Please take a look at the suggestions listed in selected blog postings on this blog:
Posted by tracks and airports, a resident of the Adobe-Meadows neighborhood, on Mar 2, 2012 at 12:40 pm
More rail crossings? If they are asking for grade crossings, this is one of the nuttiest ideas I have ever heard coming from Palo Alto residents.
As it is, all grade crossings should be closed. They are far too dangerous for all involved. Everywhere in Europe (where trains are very common) they have eliminated grade crossings in urban areas. What we need, if anything is more underpasses or overpasses.
However, I must say that, as a person who ruled out buying a house near the tracks because of the tracks, I find that people who knowingly bought near the tracks have very little legitimacy when it comes to asking for fixes to the tracks. They had to know what they were getting into. They are like people who buy near airports and then start complaining about the airplanes. Give me a break.
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Mar 3, 2012 at 8:27 am Walter_E_Wallis is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online
I agree with T & A, all grade crossings should be closed, not as a component of some grand plan, but as a necessary immediate change. Beside the obvious elimination of grade crossing accidents this would eliminate the horn blowing and enable higher train speeds.
Posted by James Baloun, a resident of the Charleston Meadows neighborhood, on Mar 3, 2012 at 2:27 pm
It is standard practice to completely separate the auto and high speed train traffic with grade separation. This study is talking about increasing the number of locations where pedestrians can move from one side of the corridor to the other. This would help make the neighborhoods along the corridor much more walkable and pedestrian friendly. Grade separation also makes it less likely to have fatal accidents, although it almost impossible to stop someone who is determined to place themselves in harm's way. There will be less need for the trains to sound their horns, and cross-street traffic will not have to wait for the trains.
Posted by YIMBY, a resident of the University South neighborhood, on Mar 6, 2012 at 1:31 pm YIMBY is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online
In response to the question posed by " HSR only?", my understanding is that our group is called "Rail Corridor" and not HSR Corridor for the reason you inquire about - it is about the current Caltrain corridor and nearby areas - extending to Alma and El Camino. In fact, in reviewing the article, per Councilman Burt's comments, we are encouraged to NOT look at state issues around Caltrain, much less HSR, that are relevant to the corridor.......speaking only for myself as one member of the task force.
Posted by Larry Cohn, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Mar 7, 2012 at 8:19 pm
I think you'll find that historically, the number of people who have been accidentally killed or seriously injured by trains (e.g. their car gets stuck on the tracks) during the past 100+ years is quite small.
Posted by robit noops, a resident of the Greenmeadow neighborhood, on Mar 9, 2012 at 9:05 am
I was stopped at the red light crossing at Cambridge and some lady pulled right up behind me and stopped on the tracks. I could see the northbound train down the tracks. The lady ignored the signs, and the common sense not to stop on train tracks. It is not an issue of the train tracks, it is an issue of people being to ignorant to heed common sense. I have lived in other cities that didnt have half the safety features of palo alto train crossings, but they were much safer because the people in those cities used common sense.
Posted by rambrasil, a resident of the Professorville neighborhood, on Nov 18, 2012 at 10:35 am
People advocating for underpasses or overpasses should recognize that they also kill the living standards near these places. They serve as gathering points for drug exchange, homeless folks and more importantly, many take it as a free pass to urinate and defecate near these. Just notice the state of the University ave. crossing and you will have to acknowledge that. I live in Sand Hill, far from all this, but would note that it is not fair to dismiss everyone who lives near the train tracks with "they knew what they were getting into". Yes, as it is now they knew. But you cant push on them a new bullet train, High speed rail or under/overpasses. They were not signing up to be subject to those. Unfortunately, the majority in this country seems to mean authority to push everyone around with some kind of moral authority. No, we are in a republic. And we have equal rights... So in all fairness, I wouldn't ever buy a home near a train track, but I can't support train track measures that those who live near it object...
Posted by Go back to the drawing board, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Nov 18, 2012 at 12:03 pm
"People advocating for underpasses or overpasses should recognize that they also kill the living standards near these places. They serve as gathering points for drug exchange, homeless folks and more importantly, many take it as a free pass to urinate and defecate near these. Just notice the state of the University ave. crossing and you will have to acknowledge that."
I agree and would add that anything with transit activity diminishes living standards for a neighborhood, which is why there was community concern to begin with.
The task force looked at ways to "improve the corridor" but failed to give the task force the job to address community concerns. This is evident because they now suggest increasing circulation, and they make them sound pretty with words like "friendly."
It's surprising that resident representatives bought into the architectural hype and forgot reality.
"transit-rich" and "neighborhood" doesn't go together. City needs to go back to the drawing board, and instead of "improving the corridor" for the single-minded objective of overbuilding Palo Alto, focus on keeping the corridor clean, safe, and not overbuilt.