Palo Alto's missing transit alternative: low-speed rail
Original post made by Transit Guy on Apr 1, 2011
This little-known, easygoing technology, which is slowly catching on in cities across the globe, is low-cost, friendly to the environment and non-disruptive to communities' quality of life. While HSR is estimated to cost California $65 billion (and climbing), low-speed rail costs a whopping $50,000 (contingency fees included).
Why spend massive amounts of tax-payer dollars for underground tunnels, elevated tracks and property-taking? Low-speed rail -- which is basically a handcar, though it looks a lot nicer than the ones from the 1800s -- can operate on existing Caltrain right-of-way. No need for government subsidies, endless pleas to reluctant private investors, trying to sell air rights or launching the project in obscure Central Valley towns so as not to raise a ruckus.
And the timeline? Forget 2035. Heck, we could get it going tomorrow! As usual, I think Palo Alto is overthinking the thing. Low-speed rail: It's the right thing to do.
(Oh, and APRIL FOOLS!)
If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
. . . People will never forget how you made them feel.
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,225 views
It Depends... Disguising Real Characters in Fiction
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 398 views