Town Square

Post a New Topic

Update on the Economy

Original post made by stephen levy, University South, on Nov 23, 2010

I wish everyone a happy and peaceful Thanksgiving.

This story contains 1117 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (12)

Like this comment
Posted by Lycos
a resident of another community
on Nov 23, 2010 at 10:51 pm

I wish I was so optimistic.

We need 3% annual job growth just keep up with population growth and keep unemployment unchanged. We need 5% annual growth to reduce the unemployment rate by 1%. The nation is at 9.6%, but California is at 12.4% -- who is ready to gamble on the next 5 years of solid 5% annual growth to reduce our unemployment to a "normal" 7% or so?

Businesses are leaving California rather than coming here. When expanding, businesses try to do it elsewhere rather than here. Our taxes are some of the highest in the nation and they are not going to get lower in the foreseeable future. So why would we grow?

Green technology? Photovoltaics? Wind energy? Perhaps, but hard to believe. There is nothing unique to California that makes this likely to happen here. The technology is not very demanding and the Silicon Valley know-how plays a rather tiny role in it. Given California's higher costs of doing business, the bulk will happen elsewhere. Our VCs are excited about government handouts but those will soon stop, and the VCs are not fools -- after mopping the handouts, manufacturing will be done elsewhere.

Biotech perhaps? Not such a growth industry anymore, and -- again -- California has little unique contribution to offer, except our weather. Add California's heavy handed environmental regulations and I wouldn't hang too many hopes on it to pull us out.

I don't hear many public grumbles about the extra 25-50 cent a gallon we are happily paying for our "super-special clean" gas. We have just rejected prop. 23 and that will cost us a few extra unemployment points. I don't hear rumblings about easing our regulatory burden or our tax burden.

So, no, I am not very optimistic. I wish I was as hopeful as Mr. Levy. If California was truly serious about improving its economic position we would be racing to resubmit prop 23 for another vote, and we would be clamoring to reopen California waters for drilling. But we'd rather feel good than be smart.

It is going to be a very long recession for California.

Like this comment
Posted by Agree with Lycos
a resident of Evergreen Park
on Nov 24, 2010 at 4:59 am

Lycos, my first thoughts agreed with yours.

My second was in reaction to the comment of Mr. Levy that the biggest danger is 'rancor and persistent" disagreement etc.

All I can think is...where is this belief when the left is "persistently and rancorously" disagreeing? Then it is only patriotic and trying to "do the right thing".

There is persistent rancor because those of us who knew better knew that bail-outs, government regulations, taxes and a ruling elite belief that picking winners and losers, and "redistributing" the wealth and health of "winners" to "losers" was going to ride the car off the cliff and freeze up private investments...

To see this continuing belief in the face of all historical and current data causes a bit of rancor.

I have no optimism in the short-term at all.

Mine will return when we let individuals risk, create and keep what they earn so that they can invest and buy and grow our economy. Or let them fail and take their own knocks so that others can rise up behind them instead of locking them into their failing mode with bail-outs and regulations.

Of course there will be some short term winners with the "new normal". But as we have seen there are a lot more losers than winners, and in the long term we are all losers.

I want the "old normal" back.

Like this comment
Posted by Paul Losch
a resident of Palo Alto
on Nov 24, 2010 at 3:17 pm

Paul Losch is a registered user.

A few observations. Thanksgiving best wishes to all who read Stephen's comments:

1. I seriously question the members of our US Congress/Senate and the counterparts in Sacramento know a thing about economics. Fiscal policy, monetary policy are Econ 101. We are way past that. When some are saying the way to economic recovery is to maintain tax cuts and some are saying let's keep the stimulus going, my interpretation is that neither opinio is informed about economics, it is political.

2. There are in IMHO, structural problems in the US economy which have to do with our inability to offer products and services cost effectively. As a result, many things are outsourced to other countries, and those jobs will not come back.

3. Despite the rhetoric about helping US small businesses to get the economy back in a growth mode, I do not see it on the "ground," as a small business owner and who has many still alive and many dead small business customers. Credit still sucks, orders are down to keep inventory exposure to a minimum, hiring is not permanent; all sorts of insurance are exhorbitant. None of these matters have anything to do with the "Bush Tax Cuts."

The cynic in me says that the "small business owners" that supposedly earn over $250,000/year are a myth. Rather, they are attorneys, CPA, MD's, and the like. They don't create new jobs. Instead, it is businesses like mine, employing real people based on customer demand, which don't fit the description of such an earning level. Think about your dry cleaner, local market, print shop.

I think the best economic indicators are how full parking lots are in commercial and industrial parks, and how the likes of UPS and FEDEX are doing. The parking lots are at best not very full, as is the case with those delivery trucks driving around.

Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of another community
on Nov 24, 2010 at 3:24 pm

"American businesses earned profits at an annual rate of $1.66 trillion in the third quarter, according to a Commerce Department report released Tuesday. That is the highest figure recorded since the government began keeping track over 60 years ago, at least in nominal or non-inflation-adjusted terms.

Corporate profits have been going gangbusters for a while. Since their cyclical low in the fourth quarter of 2008, profits have grown for seven consecutive quarters, at some of the fastest rates in history."

Web Link

Structural problems?

Too much corporate welfare to the huge companies that are sitting on cash, not hiring, banking on tax holidays for their cash overseas, etc..

Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of another community
on Nov 24, 2010 at 3:44 pm

Other "strucural problems" in our country, from today's news, corporate control of politicos, division:

"Tom DeLay was found guilty of conspiring to launder $190,000 of corporate contributions through the Republican National Committee to seven candidates for the Texas House."

"Updated 4:53 p.m.: Tom DeLay, the former U.S. House majority leader whose name became synonymous with the Republicans’ controversial rise to power in the Texas House, was found guilty this evening of laundering money in connection with the 2002 elections.

Jurors sent a note on yellow legal paper that a verdict had been reached to the judge at 4:46 p.m. They had deliberated for nearly 19 hours, since Monday afternoon.

It was read to a hushed courtroom three minutes later. DeLay appeared shocked.

DeLay, at one time one of the most powerful men in Washington, was charged with money laundering and conspiracy to commit money. He faces a possible sentence of 5-99 years in prison and a maximum $10,000 fine on the money laundering charge, and 2-20 years in prison and a possible $10,000 fine on the conspiracy charge."

Web Link

Structure is more than decaying bridges...

Like this comment
Posted by James
a resident of College Terrace
on Jan 14, 2011 at 4:03 pm

How is the CA state economy doing?

I doubt that there will be federal bailout, anymore. Been there, done that, but no more water in the well.

Any ideas?

Like this comment
Posted by Agree with Lycos
a resident of Evergreen Park
on Feb 24, 2011 at 8:28 am

James, I suspect reality will eventually hit California, like it has Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio...reality is sweeping the nation.

These States are on the right track, though not a fix-all for today, definitely the right direction.

Either spend less, and encourage private business with less onerous regulation and taxes...or go bankrupt. Either way is painful, but I prefer to avoid the crash and burn of a total bankruptcy.

Continuing borrowing to spend, continuing to kill businesses ..well, we have tried that in our State and our nation, as have many other nations, and this leads only to collapse.

Hard times ahead, but I am finally, after 3 years, beginning to have some hope that we will have the willpower to stave off total bankruptcy, begin building the ladder out of crushing debt on our children, and begin "legalizing and rewarding" private innovation and business growth.

Like this comment
Posted by Truth in Jokes
a resident of another community
on Mar 6, 2011 at 10:42 am

A CEO, a tea party member, and a union worker are all sitting at a table when a plate with a dozen cookies arrives. Before anyone else can make a move, the CEO reaches out to rake in eleven of the cookies. When the other two look at him in surprise, the CEO locks eyes with the tea party member. "You better watch him," the executive says with a nod toward the union worker. "He wants a piece of your cookie."

"This little game, pitting one group of working class voters against another, isn't just a trick, it's THE trick."

Like this comment
Posted by James
a resident of College Terrace
on Mar 6, 2011 at 12:44 pm


Should the CEO have taken only 3.7 cookies? Or less? Or more?

Or should she have just ordered a Perrier and avoided the calories?

Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of another community
on Mar 6, 2011 at 3:16 pm

Good one. It gets to the point that we've returned to the robber baron era in terms of inequity. Web Link

James: don't get the reference to "3.7" Is there a reason you picked that specific a number, and I'm missing the point? Perhaps the link above will allow you to pick which part of the Gilded Age you admire.

Staying in the mood of the above editorial posting - This Modern World: Sacrifices must be made! Web Link

"Punishing Success" my a..

Like this comment
Posted by James
a resident of College Terrace
on Mar 6, 2011 at 6:41 pm

"James: don't get the reference to "3.7" Is there a reason you picked that specific a number, and I'm missing the point?"

I assumed that even a semi-serious mind would understand that the cookies did not arrive without a cost, thus of 12 cookies, only 11 would be left for the taking. One cookie would go to the producer and server. 11/3 = 3.7 (approx), after the roundup.

Sorry I had to explain it to you. Econ 101.

The most serious question is whether the CEO would choose to eat even one cookie, considering how her weight might be affected. A deeper question, probably at the econ 103 level, is whether or not the tea party or union people should eat even one cookie...or should they sweep them off the table, so that the crows can eat them? Econ 104 gets to the issue of whether the crows should eat them or ignore them.


Like this comment
Posted by Dump the games
a resident of Meadow Park
on Mar 7, 2011 at 6:22 am

Web Link

Web Link

Appropriate to economic/political games that AREN'T jokes..up to over 1,000 "exemptions" to that great Obama legacy, Obamacare....if it is so great, why are Democrat buddies getting exemptions, including Unions who pushed for it? Why isn't anyone in Congress/Federal employees affected by it?

Dump it. Bad for the "exempted", bad for all of us, business killing, economy kiling.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Michelin 2017: Madera regains its star; others retain status
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 4,715 views

Disputing a Council Endorsement on Attitude toward residents
By Douglas Moran | 21 comments | 3,899 views

Why Are Two Plastic Bag Propositions on the California Ballot?
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 2,065 views

By Max Greenberg | 0 comments | 687 views

Marriage Interview 16: X-Wife and Widow Issues
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 604 views


The 2016-17 Info Guide is here!

Info Palo Alto, a resource guide for the Midpeninsula, features local information on schools, outdoors and recreation, government and arts & entertainment