Proposition 22 would close this loophole, prohibiting the state from taking further redevelopment tax increment. It would also amend Proposition 1A, no longer allowing the state to borrow local property taxes at times of fiscal distress.
What Proposition 22 does not do, however, is say how the state legislature is supposed to balance the state budget, provide funding for all of the important programs the state pays for, and also give voters the kind of schools they want. In short, while local governments may win, someone else is going to have to lose. State lawmakers will certainly find some other loophole or some other revenue source not covered by Proposition 22 -- because the alternative, cutting basic public services, is both unattractive and highly unpopular among voters. [Act V]
So, no matter what happens this November, stay tuned for Act VI.
This story contains 223 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.