Wisdom on forum behavior Palo Alto Issues, posted by Peter, a resident of the Southgate neighborhood, on Apr 12, 2007 at 11:59 am
Jon Carroll wrote a fine column this morning about behavior on on-line forums like this one, based on the experience with the Well, the oldest of Internet gathering places. I think it's worthwhile reading.
Posted by stephen levy, a resident of the University South neighborhood, on Apr 12, 2007 at 6:36 pm
Thanks for the post. I just joined the postings a short while back and must confess some of the banter back and forth is curious as to what folks are using the Town Square for.
Posted by George, a resident of the Evergreen Park neighborhood, on Apr 14, 2007 at 12:50 am
It's the Weekly's behavior that is hard to understand. [Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.] The Weekly seems to like the traffic the trolls create, there are always new people who respond for a while until they realize they are dealing with an angry mischief maker, someone just expressing anger anonymously, trying to get a rise out of the readers. Or the nonsense of [portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.] Those meaningless posts seem ok with the Weekly.
The Weekly could limit the number of posts any one person can place in a day.Lots of things they can do to raise the standards here. For some reason, they aren't doing it.
Posted by Anonymous, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Apr 15, 2007 at 10:27 pm
Suggestions for Palo Alto Online (Embarcadero Publishing)
1. Setup logins and stipulate that only non-anonymous accounts can start new topics. (Maybe require a paid subscription like the Times Select accounts so these forums can generate a revenue stream :-)
2. Limit the number of post from the same IP address per day to some number like 10 to encourage longer more reasoned posts.
3. Cut off the discussion on any single topic to some number, like 30, or time period, like 2 days. Additional discussions on the same topic can continue but only if a new topic is created.