Town Square

Post a New Topic

City employees exhorbitant salaries need to be cut down

Original post made by Shocked, South of Midtown, on Apr 1, 2010

City of Palo Alto 2009 gross salary data was recently published

This story contains 302 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (10)

Like this comment
Posted by Jim
a resident of Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Apr 1, 2010 at 4:15 pm

[Post removed due to same poster using multiple names]

Like this comment
Posted by VoxPop
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Apr 1, 2010 at 4:43 pm

The school budget is not the city budget.
I don't think those salaries are out of line, and I'm not an employee of the any governmental entity.

These salaries were probably arrived at by negotiation, and may be under contract, so I'm not sure you could just order a 20% decrease, or even vote one in.

Any employment lawyers who can comment on that?

Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Apr 1, 2010 at 8:54 pm

A reduction will never happen, that much we know. Still, good to shine daylight on these figures.

Like this comment
Posted by Anon
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 2, 2010 at 9:19 am

As as well-known, wages and salaries are downwardly inflexible. In times past, there was an extreme shortage in some areas of expertise, and the city was forced to pay more. Now, those salaries are locked in until inflation pushes them down (and, we have been deflating for about 1-1/2 years). Hard to do anything short-term. In the long run, public agencies need to find a way to pay retention bonuses, just as the military does, and, as private industry does also, rather than lock in big pay raises. I may be wrong, but, "shocked" may have received some hefty bonuses in 1998-2000-- certainly plenty of people did-- and got paid far more than the equivalent city employee at that time. Now, the public employees have a good deal. In general, I think public and private employers need to find ways to compensate well during good times without locking in too-high salaries that create big problems during bad times. For private employers, that was the whole idea behind profit-sharing and stock options that, in fact, (the old) HP was one of the pioneers of.

Like this comment
Posted by College student
a resident of another community
on Apr 2, 2010 at 9:24 am

[Post removed due to same poster using multiple names]

Like this comment
Posted by I dont get it
a resident of another community
on Apr 2, 2010 at 12:30 pm

The only thing out of line is that 99% of the City of Palo Alto's Employees do not have a high enough income to qualify to buy a house in Palo Alto. If you want to lower their pay, then also lower property values, (and we know that will never happen!).

Like this comment
Posted by cityworker
a resident of another community
on Apr 2, 2010 at 8:38 pm

Since you make over $100k, are you willing to take a 20% cut too? That's $23,000 PAY CUT for you.

SEIU already took around 8-10% cuts to benefits. You want cuts? Jim Keene will give them to you. There is going to be a significant amount of layoffs and service cuts coming in the next few weeks.

The sad thing is the positions listed above most likely won't be touched. They are all management. The cuts will be 90% SEIU.

Don't complain that it takes longer for PAPD or PAFD to respond to your emergency, or that the Library is open for shorter hours or there is a longer wait at Revenue Collections.

You all should be happy. You got what you wanted.

Like this comment
Posted by Anon
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 3, 2010 at 7:59 am

Thanks for posting the link to the salaries. Except for some of the top managers, most of the salaries don't seem that out of line.

Like this comment
Posted by Add the extras
a resident of Community Center
on Apr 4, 2010 at 3:45 pm

The salary for the top managers above should add in the benefits they receive and the bonuses. The numbers above don't begin to describe the money they make.
The Library Director probably makes closer to $240,000 than the number above.
Plus generous vacation and sick leave.
What was the reason for the bonuses anyway?

Like this comment
Posted by lifetime jobs?
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 4, 2010 at 4:22 pm

I agree with Add the extras, Total compensation is more relevant than salaries alone,

can you make salaries plus extras available?

also, how many positions are there with similar responsibilities - for example what's the difference between a business analyst 125K +and a financial analyst 112K+, and how do they connect with the budget manager 128 K+ and the HR business analyst 105K.

And all this analysis still ended up resulting in a "recently discovered" $4.8 million budget hole that was reported in December.

Plus when you hear about all the automatic raises, and that these also seem like lifetime jobs?

it's not personal against the employees, just fair questions

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

And one more makes three
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 12,166 views

Sam's Chowder House Palo Alto to become burger chain
By Elena Kadvany | 11 comments | 5,004 views

Secretary of Plate
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 3,600 views

New York College Tours
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,410 views

Sing and celebrate
By Sally Torbey | 1 comment | 246 views


Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 23 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away more than $4 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. When you make a donation, every dollar is automatically doubled, and 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.