Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS   CRIMES & INCIDENTS
  HISTORIC PHOTOS   ISSUES BEYOND PALO ALTO   MOVIES PALO ALTO ISSUES
  RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   JAY THORWALDSON'S BLOG
  PAUL LOSCH'S COMMUNITY BLOG   REBECCA WALLACE'S AD LIBS BLOG   STEPHEN LEVY'S ECONOMY BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MAIN VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
Barron Park hillside spraying all about money
Palo Alto Issues, posted by Peter Deutsch, a resident of Menlo Park, on Mar 16, 2007 at 2:20 pm

The lead sentence in the "green" education article on page 3 of the March 7 Weekly Web Link incorrectly presents the "classic conflict" as between "nature and public safety," which it is not.

It is between nature and money.

As the article makes clear, the reason the school district destroyed the hillside was to save money. It was less expensive than maintaining safety by mowing.

So what lesson did the kids learn? That money talks louder than nature and that the affluent community of Palo Alto, no matter what it preaches, doesn't choose to spend its money on keeping its irreplaceable natural environment healthy.

What a sad situation.


Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by parent, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Mar 17, 2007 at 12:36 am

This was just so unnecessary. I would like to know who was responsible for this decision. If money was the issue, it would have been so easy to have a penny drive to pay for goats, and even have school field trips to see them in action.

The surfactant in Roundup has been shown in recent research to kill frogs, at relatively low concentrations. (Not the poison, the detergent used to disperse the poison.) The Australian government even required Monsanto to change to a less dangerous surfactant in order to continue selling the poison in Australia. That's all stuff that is going to wash down into the creek and kill not only frogs, but native salamanders. As far as I know, the detergent does not degrade like the poison is supposed to.

Again, this was a totally unnecessary measure that runs counter to the kind of smart stewardship of the earth we should be teaching our kids.

Why weren't parents notified of this in advance? (Isn't there a state law to that effect?)


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   


Best Website
First Place
2009-2012

 

Palo Alto Online   © 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.