Town Square

Post a New Topic

Los Angeles might require rainwater capture

Original post made by Resident, Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Feb 4, 2010

Los Angeles might require rainwater capture

This story contains 103 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (2)

Like this comment
Posted by Anon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Feb 4, 2010 at 6:00 pm

it is a measure of elitism in the economy that projects such as rainwater capture that would tend to close the loop in the environment and make our way of life more sustainable are looked at as being too expensive for the group of people who make huge profits off development the way it is. ideas such as this should be tried, and when they are proven should be implemented enthusiastically by everyone as yeilding progress and work for people. we do things backward, not for the value of getting something done, but for the profit possible when there is a catastrophe, disaster, or shortage.

Like this comment
Posted by Odd markets
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Feb 5, 2010 at 5:46 am

It is very simple..if you live somewhere that is unsustainable in supporting itself, figure out a way to support yourself.

LA has little natural access to water..catch you water!

What is the big deal?

If I choose to live in the Amazon, I have to figure out how to stay dry..if I choose a desert, I have to figure out how to get water. Don't expect others to do it for you.

If you live on the beach of an ocean, don't expect others to bail you out when you get wiped out from a sliding cliff, .or in the south..from a hurricane.

If you live in a known flood plain,don't expect others to bail you out when you flood.

Choose life wisely.

What do you think would happen if we went back to paying our own prices for our own choices?

Builders would HAVE to assure home buyers of water and voila..incentive naturally built in. Right now there is no reason to build in water conservation/capture homes because we transport water from those with "more" to those with "less".

Basic principal at work here..redistribution of resources of any kind result in odd markets.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Paris Baguette coming to Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 14 comments | 4,537 views

Sing and celebrate
By Sally Torbey | 7 comments | 1,064 views

Surviving Family Holidays
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 334 views


Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 23 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away more than $4 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. When you make a donation, every dollar is automatically doubled, and 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.