Town Square

Post a New Topic

Alcohol may have been factor in fatal crash

Original post made on Jun 14, 2008

Alcohol and excessive speed may have been a factor in a late-night car crash in Portola Valley Thursday that took the life of a 19-year-old Redwood City man, the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office said.


Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, June 13, 2008, 2:22 PM

Comments (6)

Posted by Tom Alciere, a resident of another community
on Jun 14, 2008 at 6:40 am

Lauren Berglund was 20 when she was killed by a drunk driver, 40, in Boulder Creek, 14 May 2007. Rebecca Siebenmorgen was 19 when she was killed by a high driver, age 47. Brittanya Metchelle Nash was 17 and Shanice Patrice Carter was 18 when they were killed by Roberto Vellanoweth, 63. Young folks are the VICTIMS of older drunk drivers because efforts focus on preventing underage drinking instead of punishing the guilty, the drunk drivers. Don't punish 19-year-olds because this one committed a crime. Punish the drunk drivers.


Posted by Parent, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 14, 2008 at 8:45 am

Tom

I agree with everything you write.

But, I would go further. Young drivers are much more vulnerable because they haven't gained the experience that comes with years of driving. Young drivers feel that because they have passed a test they are able to get themselves out of any situation and know what to do.

Unfortunately, this is not the case. It doesn't take very much effort for a 16 year old to learn how to move the car and how to drive in traffic when everyone is obeying the rules that should be obeyed. What they need to learn is that there are idiots out there on the roads and it is much better to avoid the idiots when they see them and to drive defensively. Many think that they will not have an accident because they are obeying the rules. What they don't think about is that it usually takes two to crash and it is better not to be one of those drivers even if you are the innocent party.

Our methods of teaching teenagers to drive is pretty pathetic. When teens start driving at 15 1/2 they are very immature. When they pass their tests and get their licences, they are still pretty immature. They need to have a big red sign on them saying, "danger I am a rookie driver and I may make a mistake - particularly if you do something wrong".

I am not blaming the drivers, just the system. It is time that lawmakers tighten up the rules allowing teens to get behind the wheel.

And lastly, I am not saying that the young people you mention in your post were at fault at all, I have no idea of the details. I would just like to see more young people protected from idiots on the road. It is easy to punish a drunk driver for killing at teenager. I would prefer the accident to have not happened in the first place. You can't bring back the life of someone killed in a crash.


Posted by Lauren Tyson, Retired Peace Officer, ABC, a resident of another community
on Jun 14, 2008 at 7:36 pm

The solution is a comprehensive approach. Communities, the government, and the alcohol industry all have a role to play in preventing drunk driving by both youth and adults. Youth and adults are both victims and perpetrators. You can't always control the individual drinker, but you can control those factors that contribute to either underage drinking by minors--or excessive consumption by adults. For example, bars and restaurants should have written alcohol management policies that spell out things such as drink limits, when I.D. will be checked on patrons, and what will be done with patrons who become intoxicated. Just my short answer to a huge problem.


Posted by Tom Alciere, a resident of another community
on Jun 16, 2008 at 5:31 pm

<<when I.D. will be checked on patrons,

The government does not own the outvoted discrimination victims and has no right to impose the drinking age on them against their will. In a free country, the citizen would decide what to eat and drink.

Fight drunk driving. Web Link


Posted by nicole, a resident of Portola Valley
on Jun 16, 2008 at 5:52 pm

so tom are you saying that this boy who was murdered down the street from where I live is less dead than if an older person took the wheel. he should be held responsible regardless of age because the end result is that a kid is DEAD and he was the one responsible. Allowing kids to get away with murder is the problem in our society. Punish Keith and hopefully he and others can learn from his mistakes; since Robert can not learn anything from here on out.


Posted by kelly, a resident of Portola Valley
on Feb 10, 2009 at 7:26 pm

RIP ROBERT WETZEL


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Services, Dining and Shopping Downtown in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 16 comments | 2,283 views

Handmade truffle shop now open in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 2,028 views

It's the End of the World as We Know It: "Snowpiercer"
By Anita Felicelli | 1 comment | 1,512 views

Why is doing nothing so difficult?
By Sally Torbey | 7 comments | 989 views

Call it a novel: Dirty Love by Andre Dubus III
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 182 views