Posted by Concerned PA resident, a resident of the Duveneck/St. Francis neighborhood, on Feb 25, 2008 at 11:08 pm
This is outrageous! To me, the Police Dept is on a fishing expedition to try to find something to justify their poor handling of this matter. This "full time investigation" has been going on for a month already. I think someone should look into what the police has been doing and how they have been spending our tax dollars on this investigation.
Posted by Daniel, a resident of the Community Center neighborhood, on Feb 25, 2008 at 11:49 pm
It's worse than you think, Concerned. The investigation has been going on since the burglary last June - that's NINE months ago. The police have failed to come up with anything about either the burglary or their "fishing expedition".
Hard to imagine them getting away with this in Palo Alto, but they seem to be doing so.
Posted by Dave, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Feb 26, 2008 at 9:36 am
Interesting that people with no background or knowledge about police procedure should complain because the police are doing the job they are paid to do. No one has been accused of a crime prematurely which means the rights of all citizens have been protected.
Posted by My2Cents, a resident of another community, on Feb 26, 2008 at 10:09 am
Did it every occur to anyone that the employees involved are on ADMINISTRATIVE leave, and are getting paid in full while they aren't working? What about the expense of an exhaustive investigation for the P.D.? It is in neither the interest of the city nor the P.D. to extend this investigation for one minute longer than neccessary, and I'm sure they won't.
If financial fraud did indeed occur it could take weeks, if not longer, for the financial institutions involved to deliver the requested information. Banks are not set up to do this, it's a rare event and there are no employees who aren't already busy doing their regular duties.Ask any bank employee.
Blaming the amount of time for the investigation on the Palo Alto Police Department (who I personally really dislike) is inaccurate and ignorant.
Posted by Tim, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Feb 26, 2008 at 3:31 pm
Ignore the cries of outrage PAPD. These comments are certainly being made by those who know little or nothing about the case, or how complex these investigations must be. The critics need to stop reacting emotionally. I am grateful that the PAPD is taking a thorough, measured approach, or would you rather they rush to judgment without processing all the facts. Be patient.
Posted by Patience Required, a resident of the Duveneck/St. Francis neighborhood, on Feb 27, 2008 at 12:01 am
By all accounts, the theater office was stuffed to the gills. Seeing as it can take weeks, months, sometimes even years for people to slog through their own office paperwork after they've make the mistake of letting things build up too far, I think it's unreasonable to expect the PAPD to be speedy as they sift through someone else's accumulation. There is always a consequence for deferred maintenance and unfortunately PAPD is being saddled with blame for a slow pace.
Please note that I am not trying to disparage any theater employees. I am certain they placed a higher priority on interaction with the children than on office administration and that sentiment is commendable. However the truth remains that PAPD has been tasked with searching through an out of control office and that task is likely to require more time than might seem reasonable under other circumstances.
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Feb 27, 2008 at 4:50 pm
The total operating cost of the theater through the years is nothing in comparison to the money blown on questionable greenie schemes and city attempts to bring back the doctrine of interposition. One wonders whose toes the theater crowd trod on.