Town Square

Post a New Topic

Keeping the cars away

Original post made on Jan 23, 2008

Relieved College Terrace neighborhood residents have won a concession from Stanford University over housing developments that are planned along Stanford Avenue.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, January 23, 2008, 12:00 AM

Comments (9)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Frustrated
a resident of College Terrace
on Jan 23, 2008 at 9:42 pm

I absolutely hate the idea of this green belt, small though it is, being turned into high density housing. And I know it will change this neighborhood I know and love, and not for the better. But I realize, too, that this is private land owned by Stanford, and I have no more right to tell them not to build the housing they need then I have to tell the neighbors across the street that the purple paint they used for their house also wrecks my view. What to do?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Mike
a resident of College Terrace
on Jan 24, 2008 at 12:26 am

This is a great way to go forward. Reasonable residents, and an institution that is willing to negotiate with them. This is the kind of measured approach we should be taking with Stanford in all negotiations.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Jan 24, 2008 at 3:55 am

I suggest we close all roads into College Terrace until they decide to join the real world where a right of way is what it was dedicated for.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 24, 2008 at 11:55 am

Frustrated, the road in front of your house is a public right of way; anyone can drive on it, anyone can park on it. Why buy a house on Stanford Avenue if you don't want traffic?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by egret lover
a resident of College Terrace
on Jan 24, 2008 at 7:04 pm

To "Resident":
Kindly note that the posting by "Frustrated" focused on the loss of the narrow green strip between Stanford Avenue and Olmsted Rd, i.e. the land that the houses will be built on. There's not a word in that message about cars and the behavior of their owners.

In fact, many people will be missing that last bit of undeveloped space. The drainage ditch will be entubated, so the egrets who stop by seasonally won't be seen anymore. The annual cycle of green growth when rains begin, grass that isn't a lawn species, the mowers just before Stanford graduation will be history. Not exactly like paving over Yosemite, but a loss to neighbors none the less.

To his/her credit, "Frustrated" clearly grasps some basics of private property rights that so many Palo Altans seem to forget, and isn't expecting to be able to stop this development.

The facts are that this is privately owned land, never zoned as open space and outside of Palo Alto. In fact, its fate was sealed in December 2000 when this parcel was designated for medium density housing in 2000 when the County Supervisors approved Stanford's GUP.

That said, it's still perfectly legitimate for neighbors to be concerned about compatibility of what is built with the existing look and feel of the neighborhood. And given how underparked the last housing project Stanford built in this area turned out to be, there is every reason to examine the parking and circulation plans carefully.

It remains to be seen whether Stanford will be proposing the equivalent of the purple house for both the Stanford Avenue and the El Camino projects discussed in the article, or whether there will be a real effort to build a long-lasting neighborly relationship.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by WhatNoise?
a resident of College Terrace
on Jan 24, 2008 at 10:39 pm

I also lament the loss of the greenbelt and large trees that will come with the development at Stanford. As a homeowner on Stanford Avenue, I am not bothered much by traffic, but rather enjoy access to the running path and greenery across the way. This little bit of open space does much to enrich the lives of students, runners, and neighbors as well as the occasional Great Blue Heron seen on the creek. I'm sad to see it developed but realize that Stanford has the right to do so.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Robert Ruether
a resident of College Terrace
on Jan 25, 2008 at 11:58 am

I think Stanford's planned 75 houses on that green strip along Stanford avenue might be prevented by bringing attention to the fact that the green strip is a riparian way. It has a creek all along it and does attract species of water birds including egrets and blue herons. As a wet land this precious green strip in Palo Alto should not be destroyed, and I wonder if the laws of the state and country aren't available to ensure its proper valuation as the resource it represents to our progressively "green appreciating" life style. Shame on Stanford in trying to grab this last green strip and with a creek running through it.
Nature defenders please help!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sick of Stanford Metastatic Spread
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jan 25, 2008 at 9:18 pm

Why is it necessary for Stanford to stuff more university housing into this last little strip of up open green space, when there are so many open spaces scattered throughout Pine Hill? There is plenty of space up there for additional housing without creating further congestion within a very dense area.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jeremy Loski
a resident of Ventura
on Jan 25, 2008 at 11:19 pm

It's closer to transit. All neighborhoods that are closer to transit, all over America, are going to experience densification. Thier value is "proximity".

The challenge will be to find ways to maintain of neighborhood integrity as we bring more levels of dynamism and diversity to community. We've done it before; we'll do it again.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 2,914 views

WUE makes out-of-state tuition more affordable
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 2 comments | 2,766 views

Ode to Brussels Sprout
By Laura Stec | 14 comments | 2,349 views

Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,794 views

A Surprise!
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 868 views