Town Square

Post a New Topic

Letters

Original post made on Nov 1, 2007

Partisan politics

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, October 31, 2007, 12:00 AM

Comments (4)

Posted by Parent, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 1, 2007 at 10:46 am

I disagree with Walt Hays who claims that we need Townsend on the Board of Education for experience sake.

It was DESPITE being under Townsend's leadership that the board undertook the task of investigating the administrators' complaints against the former Superintendent Callan. Townsend was a staunch supporter of Callan, and was dismissive of the complaints against Callan in board meetings. It was literally Dana Tom and Gail Price who took the leadership role in the investigation and organizational improvement recommendations.

Furthermore, regarding MI, Townsend's support of the small special interest group that ultimately prevailed through threat tactics was detrimental to our district. That group prevailed NOT by convincing the board on the merits of the program, but through threats of harm to PAUSD. (The program was originally voted down by the board on merits, only to be reversed when they were presented with a specific charter threat letter from nine people. Tom read the letter allowed in the board meeting. He and Lowell cited that threat specifically as the reason for their reversal.)

Throughout the MI debate, Townsend displayed an alarming lack of interest in consequences and facts (such as enrollment growth impacts of the program, lack of feasible location, lack of supporting data in the feasibility study, literally no research into the feasibility of using an "Ohlone" method for MI, gaping holes in the articulation of full district costs, lack of alignment with strategic plan, lack of curricular equity for our elementary students, and more.)

As recently as this fall, Townsend asked no questions of the staff, and made no comments whatsoever in the board meeting discussion items regarding the 'strings' on a $750K Grant from the Department of Defense in support of MI. Proving again that she continues to support MI without regard to unintended consequences.

Townsend's brand of experience, we can do without. The faster we get three new board members, the sooner this district can heal from her leadership.


Posted by SickAndTiredOfMI, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Nov 1, 2007 at 11:07 am

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Posted by I Agree with Weekly's Endorsements, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 1, 2007 at 12:00 pm

Many people feel Townsends experience has done more harm than good to our district. PAUSD would be better off with three new board members who care about setting a sound strategy for the success of our high performing neighborhood schools, for the future.

Plus the remaining board members (Tom and Mitchell) DO have years of experience to help facilitate a transition. It is a false logic that says 4 years of combined experience is not enough or that more 'years' of incumbancy is necessarily better.

PAUSD needs a fresh start to heal from the bruising of the past year, and fresh thinking on the issues of importance in this community. I agree with the Weekly's recommendations.


Posted by Retail Supporter, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 1, 2007 at 12:01 pm

Bruce Baker, I agree, I plan to vote against Measure M and I hope others do also. I think businesses in PA are taxed to the hilt and you're right you will not gain anything by this burdensome tax. Also, I don't think the residents of PA will gain anything by this tax either, it's just more money our City Council will have to waste.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Touring the Southern California “Ivies:” Pomona and Cal Tech
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 5 comments | 2,397 views

Chai Brisket
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 1,709 views

Sometimes "I'm Sorry" Doesn't Cut It
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 918 views

Couples: Parallel Play or Interactive Play?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 777 views

SJSU Center for Steinbeck Studies to Honor Author Khaled Hosseini on Weds Sept 10
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 556 views