Town Square

Post a New Topic

Frontrunners emerge as City Council slate is finalized at 12

Original post made on Oct 5, 2007

With no incumbents, the race for four seats on the Palo Alto City Council will pit connected political newcomers against those with less name recognition in a field of 12 candidates.

This story contains 53 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (4)

Like this comment
Posted by Timothy Gray
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Oct 5, 2007 at 5:14 pm

Hi, this is Tim Gray, candidate for City Council. I just wanted to mention that at the time this story was written, I had just filed my papers of intent with the City Clerk's office. My campaign of ideas has come a long way. I was not available for comment at the time this story was written, but now I have a lot of information at: www.Vote4gray.com. Please visit me, and help me keep learning.

Tim Gray


Like this comment
Posted by question for Gray
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Oct 8, 2007 at 11:23 am

What are you going to do about the huge developments that the council keeps approving? Will you go along with that trend?
I'd appreciate a straight answer, not on the one hand and on the other hand.


Like this comment
Posted by Timothy Gray
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Oct 9, 2007 at 3:55 pm

Thank you for the question. Please check out my www.vote4gray

As a late entrant, I am still learning about the City of Palo Comprehensive Plan. One thing we know is that it involved great citizen participation and really is the "constitution" we have agreed to follow as new issues are presented.

I view it as a “constitution” of sorts. We have made a collective decision as a community, and we need to honor it... continue reading the text at Web Link .

I would welcome additional perspectives. It is widely believed that our City has participated in "spot zoning" and those actions must stop. The idea is that we have made an agreement as a community about what kind of growth will be acceptable in our future. I am a big advocate for keeping agreements, or... if those agreements are not working out, then let's go back to the table and make some new one's in the full light of day.

I will take a stand for creating a level playing field. Fairness is not a naive and idealistic concept. From my corporate advisory work, I have seen power politics used to manipulate changes one little exception at a time. It's called incrementalism, and it is wrong. I don't want to wake up in the future and say, "How in the h... did we get here?" Our best line of defense for avoiding the outcomes you are talking about is to unite around principals that have a foundation in fairness and balance. Then, on an ongoing basis being defenders of the principals.

And then on the other hand... just kidding. I offer this with respect and welcome your suggestions. In the areas of the past where the Comprehensive plan's intent seems to be ignored, I would have voted no. But a minority vote is only symbolic. The bigger picture solution is the one I have previously described.

And then on the other hand... (just kidding.) Please go to www.vote4gray.com and click on the Comprehensive Plan tab.

Tim


Like this comment
Posted by Timothy Gray
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Oct 9, 2007 at 3:55 pm

Thank you for the question. Please check out my www.vote4gray

As a late entrant, I am still learning about the City of Palo Comprehensive Plan. One thing we know is that it involved great citizen participation and really is the "constitution" we have agreed to follow as new issues are presented.

I view it as a “constitution” of sorts. We have made a collective decision as a community, and we need to honor it... continue reading the text at Web Link .

I would welcome additional perspectives. It is widely believed that our City has participated in "spot zoning" and those actions must stop. The idea is that we have made an agreement as a community about what kind of growth will be acceptable in our future. I am a big advocate for keeping agreements, or... if those agreements are not working out, then let's go back to the table and make some new one's in the full light of day.

I will take a stand for creating a level playing field. Fairness is not a naive and idealistic concept. From my corporate advisory work, I have seen power politics used to manipulate changes one little exception at a time. It's called incrementalism, and it is wrong. I don't want to wake up in the future and say, "How in the h... did we get here?" Our best line of defense for avoiding the outcomes you are talking about is to unite around principals that have a foundation in fairness and balance. Then, on an ongoing basis being defenders of the principals.

And then on the other hand... just kidding. I offer this with respect and welcome your suggestions. In the areas of the past where the Comprehensive plan's intent seems to be ignored, I would have voted no. But a minority vote is only symbolic. The bigger picture solution is the one I have previously described.

And then on the other hand... (just kidding.) Please go to www.vote4gray.com and click on the Comprehensive Plan tab.

Tim


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Death by Diet
By Laura Stec | 13 comments | 7,744 views

I am Voting Yes on Measure B the Sales Tax for Transportation
By Steve Levy | 31 comments | 4,596 views

Mountain View Oktoberfest returns this weekend
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 2,548 views

My Daughter Died 18 Years Ago
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 738 views

The timing is wrong
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 556 views

 

Hangin' with the best

The results are in. See who Palo Alto Weekly readers have selected what they feel are the top spots and service providers in the Palo Alto area across 83 categories.

See the Winners