Town Square

Post a New Topic

The Political Lynching of George Zimmerman.

Original post made by Ken on Jul 13, 2013

Zimmerman (Z) was high tech lynched by the liberal press, before he was arrested. Barack Obama jumped in to tighten the noose.

But, oh what?! Z actually DID have wounds on his head, as he said, because Martin (M) attacked him, and which the liberal press denied.

High tech lynchings are almost as bad as the real deal, especially if they are hate crimes, including claims that Z did it because he is a white guy and M is black (none of which has been shown by the published evidence). BTW, Z is a mixed ethnic, and his appearence suggests that he is Latino, yet the press insisted that he is "white". Of course, the pictures of M are consistently shown as his younger self, not his older self, which is not so sweet looking. This press treatment is properly called liberal propaganda.

This thing is a teaching moment for liberals. Shameful on their part, but still a possibility of rehabilitation.
......

Note: I posted this over a year ago. Justice was done today, finally. This case should never have been filed. It was racial politics, period.

George Zimmerman deserves a huge apology.

Comments (8)

Posted by Sharon, a resident of Midtown
on Jul 13, 2013 at 8:22 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Posted by Ken, a resident of Midtown
on Jul 13, 2013 at 8:30 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Posted by Sharon, a resident of Midtown
on Jul 13, 2013 at 8:38 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Posted by bru, a resident of Crescent Park
on Jul 14, 2013 at 11:41 am

bru is a registered user.

Please remove this dubious "article" on the grounds that any article that only inflames people to post comments - all of which have been removed by the editor is not an article at all but just a slap in the face to the very idea of a town square forum.

thank you.


Posted by That User Name is already, a resident of another community
on Jul 14, 2013 at 11:47 am

That User Name is already is a registered user.

"George Zimmerman deserves a huge apology."

Surely you jest.

A man with a record of altercations with police; oddly, a wanna-be-cop. With a record of only calling the police on African American citizens. A man who, against the orders of the police dispatcher and his own neighborhood watch rules, gets out of his car, with a loaded and cocked weapon and accosts a innocent 17 year old boy after stalking him.

Who had the right to self defense? Seems like Trayvon Martin, an unarmed 17 year old, was hunted down, and had no defense against an older, heavier man armed with a gun.

Michael Savage (nee Wiener) put it well: George Zimmerman, with a loaded and ready to use weapon with the safety off, went off hunting a human and wanted to get in trouble.

He did.

The jury released George Zimmerman.

"Savage laid out his case, saying that the murder could have been avoided, but based on Zimmerman's gun having a round in the chamber with the safety off, Zimmerman intended "to find some he could shoot or intimidate."

"Zimmerman was carrying a Kel Tec semi-automatic 9mm handgun," Savage said. "So? Big deal. It is a big deal because he had a bullet chambered in the gun and he had the safety off… Had he not chambered a round prior to meeting Trayvon, and had he not taken the safety off, even if Trayvon, during the altercation even if Trayvon had tried to grab the gun away from Zimmerman — had that gun not been chambered with a round and safety off, Trayvon Martin would have had to use two hands. You can't do it with one hand." "

- Imagine how much better Zimmerman's life would be today if he stayed in his car as instructed by the police dispatcher.

- Imagine how much better Zimmerman's life would be if he had not followed and stalked Martin after calling the police.

- Imagine how much better Zimmerman's life would be today, if he just got out of the car, kept his distance from the 17 year old and said: "Hi, I'm George, of the neighborhood watch. The police are on their way, can I help you with anything?"

- Imagine Trayvon Martin being allowed to live, as you would want for anyone's child.

I cannot predict the future, but I suspect Zimmerman will be given an opportunity to apologize in a civil trial.


Posted by Chuck, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Jul 15, 2013 at 10:36 am

Chuck is a registered user.

To "That User Name"...It is also possible that Zimmerman may have been beaten to death had he not fired his weapon. I agree with you about your "imagine points." Z should have done exactly what you suggest.


Posted by isez, a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Jul 15, 2013 at 11:52 am

isez is a registered user.

If it were a black killing a black or white killing a white, we would have never heard of this case. I agree, the media did blow it up, and people judge without all the facts.

Did anyone see the TV interview with the lead defense lawyer? He said Z grew up with blacks and took a black girl to his prom. He also has a record of helping blacks. Why didn't the defense publicize this? He is not a racist. Sure, he profiled based upon a "thug" profile, but he is not a racist.

Plus, he is not a WASP. He is half Hispanic, which makes him a minority, in affirmative action definition.

I am glad the jury based their decision on facts, not politics or public opinion.


Posted by bru, a resident of Crescent Park
on Jul 15, 2013 at 10:17 pm

bru is a registered user.

>> The Political Lynching of George Zimmerman

No, it looks like everyone was right after all, it was Trayvon Martin that got "lynched", if you must use that term.

If I had to guess I'd say there are certain moves in our judicial system like in a dance. This move was the overcharge George Zimmerman with murder instead of charging him with what he did, which was really manslaughter.

The father of Zimmerman being a judge knows how to manipulate just about any situation to get a desired outcome. There may be a few cases where public outcry would be too strong, but they mean to make this stick, probably as a message that is more pro vigilanteism than it is pro- being able to walk freely and safely in your town. What this says to the public is that there is more likely to be armed people out who will take you down if you do something questionable than pushing any kind of responsiblity on these "vigilantes". I can understand this from a hardline point of view, but it is the wrong decision ... it is a decision to continue to intimidate out of fear of black people - I think.

Zimmerman disobeyed the police and put himself in that situation, and provoked Martin by stalking him and scaring him until he thought he had no recourse but to attack Zimmerman. It's too bad that Martin did not think to dial 911 and report Zimmerman.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

To post your comment, please click here to Log in

Remember me?
Forgot Password?
or register. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

The dress code
By Jessica T | 23 comments | 1,990 views

September food and drink goings on
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,388 views

Two Days to Save This Dog?
By Cathy Kirkman | 15 comments | 1,264 views

It Depends... Disguising Real Characters in Fiction
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 413 views

Twenty-five years of wedded bliss
By Sally Torbey | 0 comments | 64 views