Audit finds errors in Palo Alto's health care expenditures Palo Alto Issues, posted by Editor, Palo Alto Online, on Dec 7, 2012 at 10:35 am
Palo Alto's process for administering health benefits to city workers and retirees is riddled with errors and suffers from insufficient monitoring, according to a critical report from the Office of the City Auditor.
Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, December 7, 2012, 9:14 AM
What’s really bothersome about these findings is that many of the items identified by the Auditor’s Office could well have been dealt with by the HR Director. What’s also difficult to gather from this Audit is how many other problems of this sort exist in the HR Department’s handling of Healthcare administration?
The complexity of Healthcare administration is identified by the Audit. Clearly, the cost of Administration seems to have been ignored by previous Councils when they agreed to these contracts. It may not necessarily be in the charter of the Auditor to review the contracts of the various labor bargaining units with the goal of finding ways to reduce complexity/administrative costs/oversight/compliance—but it would be worthwhile if the Auditor were to make such a study.
Much of the management of “complexity” is supposed to be solved with the SAP software. Previous Auditors have shown no understanding of how to analyze the use of software by the various City departments in the Audits of the past. Without looking at how SAP is helping/hurting/not being used, these Audits are not as complete as they could be.
Hopefully a follow-up Audit will be scheduled within a year, so that there can be some sense of closure to these problems demonstrated by the HR people.
Lastly, the quality of Audits from this new Auditor seems to be heads-and-shoulders above those of previous Auditors. Let’s hope that this quality of work continues.
Posted by SuperD, a resident of the Community Center neighborhood, on Dec 7, 2012 at 2:44 pm
Hey, City of Palo Alto no worries!!! Just tax your way out of this mess, time to increase gas, electric, garbage, and water rates again. And, maybe throw another bond measure into the mix too. Your subjects - I mean citizens - won't mind one bit.
Posted by Read It, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Dec 7, 2012 at 2:49 pm
Kudos, if I understand the report those overpayments are being made monthly not just one time. Seems like its been happening for a while and would have continued without the auditors finding it. Looks like the report found a lot of other problems too.
Posted by Read It, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Dec 7, 2012 at 5:40 pm
Dan, you're reading a 2 page article trying to summarize a 30 page detailed report. I finally finished reading the whole thing. It's dry, and pretty boring, but focusing on the $8k is totally missing the point.
Posted by pat, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Dec 8, 2012 at 8:23 pm
bill g: I agree! Remember the Children’s Theatre scandal when the director was fired because of some checks, but was later exonerated? See Audit 'exonerates' Children's Theatre staff Web Link
The report cited “a long-standing pattern of loose accounting procedures.” Here we go again.
“The sheer complexity of tallying the reimbursement amounts” for health care should make it obvious that the process should be computerized – if only someone can be trusted to write the program.
BTW, the city has paid SAP millions, not hundreds of thousands. In May, 2009, the Utilities Department tested an $8.8 million online system, which allows customers to access their billing information and keep track of electricity use. It had so many bugs that the UD got another $224K to fix "post-implementation issues." Probably not the right consultant to hire for the health care application.
Posted by Inside Out, a resident of another community, on Dec 10, 2012 at 12:14 pm
"Lastly, the quality of Audits from this new Auditor seems to be heads-and-shoulders above those of previous Auditors. Let’s hope that this quality of work continues."
AGREED! These budget problems began back when Jay Rounds was at the end of his HRD career. Then along came Russ "Biggest Joke of Them All" Carlsen. Then you have to factor in the City Manager's current and past (Benest to Keene), as well as the Finance Directors, current and past. There has been a connected 'good ole boy' network between the three positions over the past 20 years AND it has trickled down to management level where the attitude and practices run rampant - "I'm tight with so-and-so. We golf, bbq, share holidays, our wives are friends with him/them so I can do what I want. I'm in! I can hire my unqualified friends, their kids, etc, and promote them too because I can", hence, the current most dysfunctional city organization EVER.
For example, how the current PWD got his job I'll never figure out. He got the job, fixed something (reorganized the department) that was not broken to hide the fact that his engineering staff (even under his assistant director position) is/was incompetent and insufficient to perform duties. He reorganized the public works department and hired back his retired Palo Alto buddy's as contract managers ‘because we are so overworked’ and ouila! Also, in doing so, it created MORE FTE management positions (along with the contracted ones), that this department alone is now dysfunctional with a capital D. Simply disgusting!
SERIOUSLY, the Auditor needs to do performance audits on ALL management staff and get CONFIDENTIAL input from workers they supervise. I’m not sure how ‘tight’ the Auditor is with Keene (another BIG JOKE) or FD or the new HRD (is she really a lawyer and NOT HR experienced?), and I just hope this audit is not being done maliciously to cover how inadequate leaders really are. Let’s not blame employees or retirees for mismanaged budgets! Run City of Palo Alto the way it should as a government entity and not based on politics and lining your $100K+ a year pocketbooks!
Keeping my fingers crossed that “this quality of (Auditor) work continues.”
Posted by SAP - ugh, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Dec 10, 2012 at 12:22 pm
Wasn't it city staff who didn't change the SAP access password when the consultant services ended? Remember that allowed ALL city finances and personnel information to be stolen?
How does the Finance Department continue to receive awards for being so great with all these "loose accounting practices"?
There was an employee who worked in HR that went to another department. She should have LOST all of her HR access yet she continued (and probably still does) to 'look' at the infomation. What she does/did with it, who knows. She was hurting financially then and I am sure she still is.
SAP sucks - unless you know how to use what you pay for.
Posted by Jon, a resident of the Palo Verde neighborhood, on Dec 10, 2012 at 3:48 pm
Let's be honest- $8k is a pretty small error when dealing with a large organization (and healthcare bills, no less!). There has been a mass exodus of line staff and management in the past few years, leaving big knowledge gaps. Expect this trend to continue. I hope and expect that Palo Alro residents will apply for these positions, given their excessive pay/benefit package.
Posted by Lazlo, a resident of the Old Palo Alto neighborhood, on Dec 10, 2012 at 8:52 pm
No doubt Keene and Klein's answer will be to appoint a "blue ribbon" committee to perform a lengthy review of the situation and then hire another $150,000 a year manager who will then strategically monitor the process and report back on the recovery of the .0001% overpayment to retirees. No word yet on when the city will repay those retirees whose compensation was underpaid. One should really ask how many hours, how many city employees, and at what cost did it take the auditor's office to file this report so that we can clearly understand the inefficiency and incompetence of city government.