Posted by Gary, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Nov 13, 2012 at 9:37 am
The wool ain't getting pulled over our eyes...
... but the tinfoil hat is slipping down some foreheads!!!!
The fringe is still hurting after their guarentee of a Rmoney landslide failed to happen. Birtherism won't work anymore. The tea party is dead, having personally handed the democrats 5 senate seats that should have been gop.
They got nothing, do trying to manufacture a new fast and spurious Lscandal" to pump up foxes ratings.
If this is really just about a sex scandal, why didn't it come out before the election?
Obama is as American as he wants to be, but his Islam roots may not be. I don't care about his birth certificate, but I do care about his worry about what feelings he has deep down in his heart (hint, so should you).
Posted by Roger Overnaut, a resident of the Evergreen Park neighborhood, on Nov 13, 2012 at 1:22 pm
"The wool is not being pulled over my eyes"
It doesn't have to be pulled; it's always been there.
Give in to reality. That Black Guy gets four more years in The White House. Period. And there won't be another Kevin Starr writing a porn piece fronted as an investigative report. [Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff]
Posted by Sharon, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Nov 13, 2012 at 3:46 pm
The Washington Post literally – and I mean literally – buries this detail in a profile of Jill Kelley – "a Tampa resident who poured her energies into throwing lavish parties for and hobnobbing with area military brass" – on its site today:
A military officer who is a former member of Petraeus’s staff said Kelley was a “self-appointed” go-between for Central Command officers with Lebanese and other Middle Eastern government officials.
Posted by Wool is not being pulled over my eyes, a resident of the Palo Verde neighborhood, on Nov 13, 2012 at 4:51 pm
I am accused of being upset by the election results - never mentioned any of that.
I am accused of being narrow minded and not reading newspapers - duh??
I have looked at the links proved above of pictures, fluff piece and crank ideas about secession. On the other hand, I have provided links to articles from CNN, ABC and the BBC, all questioning the events and mentioning the links to Benghazi and the hearings. Have any of you who are critical of me actually read my links? Do you realise how odd it sounds telling me to go fishing for facts and to read newspapers when that is exactly what I have been doing?
Why am I the one who is narrow minded when I am the one who has been open minded enough to read articles and find out what is being said, when all my critics are just calling me names? Perhaps attack is the only form of defence here, but the attacks on me are unfounded since I am the one with questions which the media is not answering. (or just beginning to).
If my critics would stop calling me names and start thinking straight, they may see my point.
I am the one who is searching for facts because I don't have any. If my critics can find some facts to show me by recognised news agencies (I don't mind if you use Fox or not) I will read them. Otherwise, my case is closed. (unless the media produces more news worthy of being discussed).