The New Yorker front page Issues Beyond Palo Alto, posted by Gary, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2012 at 11:29 am
This is one of the hardest hitting front covers I have in seen in years. For a liberal mag like the New Yorker to do this just shows how bad Obama did last week. Desperation is in order for the left. This debate may go down as one of the most historically significant debate events in presdidental history.
And the above cover is based on facts--Romney is to wimpy to stand up for his beliefs--he flip-flops based on how his right wing handlers want him to!!!
Posted by Gary, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2012 at 11:58 am
Gary is very happy, thank you!
The two New Yorker covers you provided only emphasize the point that an essentially anti-Romeny mag, like the New Yorker, has had it with the empty suit of Obama. Devastating for Obama.
Keep 'em coming!
Oh, btw, gasoline is at $5 in this state. The middle class does not like that. Maybe they will grow a brain and vote against the construct that the leftists have built for them.
Posted by As long as Gary is happy, a resident of Stanford, on Oct 8, 2012 at 12:10 pm
"Gary is very happy, thank you!"
and
"This is so much fun!"
I am the only disturbed by the fact that people of a certain political persuasion derive pleasure from the suffering of others. How is it that certain people do not care about our country and have become slaves to a certain ideology, at the expense of the country as a whole.
Those that are findingjoy in this should remember that the republicans pledged from day one that their goal was to prevent a second term for Obama, NO MATTER WHAT THE COST. Too bad Romney does not acknowledge that when he is attacking Obama for a lack of progress.
Posted by Sharon, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2012 at 12:20 pm
"Oh, btw, gasoline is at $5 in this state. The middle class does not like that. Maybe they will grow a brain and vote against the construct that the leftists have built for them. "
The previous high was in June 2008. Sounds like a Bush problem.
Web Link Average&city2=&city3=&crude=n&tme=96&units=us
Posted by Gary, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2012 at 12:21 pm
It is very joyful to understand that Americans can, possbily, be liberated from the empty leadership of Obama.
It is also a lot of fun for me to watch the disintegraion of the facade that brought us this empty suit. I have been very consistent about the empty suit model, for years.
The suffering of the American people will be far less, if Romney is elected. Imagine unleshing the American energy sector, for example.
At least we can celebrate the new joy that can come our way!
Posted by Gary, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Oct 8, 2012 at 1:18 pm
>The previous high was in June 2008. Sounds like a Bush problem.
The high gas prices in the past, under Bush, were part of a soaring economy. Now, have we soaring gas prices in an anemic economy. The lowest 47% of our economy, in 2008, could still get by, even if they did not pay any federal income taxes; ask them how they feel now.
Posted by That User Name is already, a resident of another community, on Oct 8, 2012 at 2:21 pm That User Name is already is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online
Gary tells us Bush's high gas prices were due to a soaring economy in....
... wait for it ...
In June, 2008.
Anyone here remember June, 2008? Obviously, Gary doesn't. Gary's great idea at the time, John McCain, and his team called it a "mental recession" and called Americans a bunch of whiners.
View in an RSS Reader
E-mail this topic.
Print this topic.
