Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS   CRIMES & INCIDENTS
  HISTORIC PHOTOS ISSUES BEYOND PALO ALTO   MOVIES   PALO ALTO ISSUES
  RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   INAUGURATION BLOG 2013
  JAY THORWALDSON'S BLOG   LONDON 94301   PAUL LOSCH'S COMMUNITY BLOG   REBECCA WALLACE'S AD LIBS BLOG
  STEPHEN LEVY'S ECONOMY BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MESSAGE BOARD VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
Effective 7/67/12, DHS can take over all private communications in "emergency"; Is this ok?
Issues Beyond Palo Alto, posted by Perspective, a resident of the Greater Miranda neighborhood, on Jul 30, 2012 at 6:33 am

Web Link

If I read this right, Obama signed into law, through Executive Order, of course, Dept of Homeland Security ( the name still gives me the creeps, like our "Czars") taking over all private communications in an emergency. Wired and wireless, including the internet, on July 6, just a couple weeks ago. Where was the news?

I am getting seriously creeped out, folks. The power of DC is growing exponentially over us, and I am very nervous. I don't think it is at all ok for our Feds to be able to take over the internet "in an emergency". Define emergency. Define controlling our commmunications.

What about you?

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by Goodone, a resident of the Adobe-Meadows neighborhood, on Jul 30, 2012 at 7:36 am

I clicked through and read the article. The quality of the publication is reflected in the second comment on the thread, reposted here, pointing out that this is just the tip of the iceberg - smart electric meters are the real threat to our liberty...

Could this monitor, record, control, manipulate communication - all without a warrant - be to bring down all those rf electric power meters recently put on houses? Could this "national security" pretext to invade communication be linked to using rf electric meters to determine what electrical equipment is there, who's home, when, what do they have - you bet it is! Get rid of those rf electric meters - their window into your life. They violate your privacy and reveal much to a satellite. They are also being used to issue warrants based on what they "suspect" from those meters. Fact!


Posted by Guvmint are bad, a resident of the Adobe-Meadows neighborhood, on Jul 30, 2012 at 10:11 am

I hear a snug fitting cap made of tin foil will keep the guvmint controlled radio waves from beaming into your brain.

It's the PUBLIC spectrum. Who do you think should control it in an emergency? AT&T?


Posted by Perspective, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Jul 30, 2012 at 12:14 pm
Perspective is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online

Web Link-

From the WhiteHouseGov site itself, a copy of the actual Executive Order signed July 6, 2012. Try reading the whole thing..then note...

Section 5.2 e:The Secretary of Homeland Security shall satisfy priority communications requirements through the use of commercial, Government, and privately owned communications resources, when appropriate;

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Ok, now then, can the snark stop and the thinking begin?

Is anyone else concerned with the language of this EO?


Comments on this topic have been limited to registered users who are logged in.

If you are a registered user, login here.
If not, registration is very simple and may be done here.


Best Website
First Place
2009-2011

 

Palo Alto Online   © 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.