Town Square

Post a New Topic

Effective 7/67/12, DHS can take over all private communications in "emergency"; Is this ok?

Original post made by Perspective, Greater Miranda, on Jul 30, 2012

This story contains 121 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (3)

Like this comment
Posted by Goodone
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 30, 2012 at 7:36 am

I clicked through and read the article. The quality of the publication is reflected in the second comment on the thread, reposted here, pointing out that this is just the tip of the iceberg - smart electric meters are the real threat to our liberty...

Could this monitor, record, control, manipulate communication - all without a warrant - be to bring down all those rf electric power meters recently put on houses? Could this "national security" pretext to invade communication be linked to using rf electric meters to determine what electrical equipment is there, who's home, when, what do they have - you bet it is! Get rid of those rf electric meters - their window into your life. They violate your privacy and reveal much to a satellite. They are also being used to issue warrants based on what they "suspect" from those meters. Fact!

Like this comment
Posted by Guvmint are bad
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 30, 2012 at 10:11 am

I hear a snug fitting cap made of tin foil will keep the guvmint controlled radio waves from beaming into your brain.

It's the PUBLIC spectrum. Who do you think should control it in an emergency? AT&T?

Like this comment
Posted by Perspective
a resident of Midtown
on Jul 30, 2012 at 12:14 pm

Perspective is a registered user.

Web Link

From the WhiteHouseGov site itself, a copy of the actual Executive Order signed July 6, 2012. Try reading the whole thing..then note...

Section 5.2 e:The Secretary of Homeland Security shall satisfy priority communications requirements through the use of commercial, Government, and privately owned communications resources, when appropriate;


Ok, now then, can the snark stop and the thinking begin?
Is anyone else concerned with the language of this EO?

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


To post your comment, please login or register at the top of the page. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Local restaurants snag Michelin Bib Gourmand status
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 4,355 views

FREE Stanford Course Explores the Design, Development, and Use of Assistive Technology - Seniors Welcome
By Max Greenberg | 3 comments | 3,936 views

Council Candidate Forums
By Douglas Moran | 6 comments | 1,449 views

Response to Arguments Against Measure B
By Steve Levy | 12 comments | 818 views

Garden Zucchini Pancakes with Umami Tomato Meets Woodside Elementary
By Laura Stec | 1 comment | 679 views


Hangin' with the best

The results are in. See who Palo Alto Weekly readers have selected what they feel are the top spots and service providers in the Palo Alto area across 83 categories.

See the Winners