Post a New Topic
Original post made
on May 6, 2012
Be specific, please.
Okay: Oscar Meyer.
First, let's get the parameters in place; Laurence, do you believe in evolution?
Do you acknowledge climate change?
If it turns out you don't believe in the theory of evolution or scientific fact and consensus, then I'll stick with the comment "baloney" and let it go.
And I'll add: Balderdash!
"First, let's get the parameters in place; Laurence, do you believe in evolution?
Do you acknowledge climate change?"
Of course, to both. I fully accept that humans are the dominant species on earth, due to natural selection, and survival of the fittest (evolutionary theory). I also believe that climate changes, and always has.
I fail to understand your basic question/assertion. Very muddled thinking....
"I also believe that climate changes, and always has" Do you believe the recent accelerated climate change is caused by human activities?
Do you believe in the Theory of Evolution, vs creationism? (as opposed to evolutionary theory)
Muddled thinking? I asked two questions, and made a silly pun about baloney.
Let's make it clear, don't want to offend L with muddled whatever...
Do you believe the recent accelerated climate change is caused by human activities, as generally outlined by the IPPC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change?
"Do you believe the recent accelerated climate change is caused by human activities, as generally outlined by the IPPC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change?"
I believe that the earth is slowly warming, for whatever reason, as it has in the relatively recent past. The IPPC report is so full of bogus holes, that is has lost most of its credibility. For example, it claimed that the Himalaya glaciers would be gone within a couple of decades...complete nonsense; forcing effect of IR in the stratosphere/troposphere are poorly understood, and should not be commented on; proxy analyis of prior warming/cooling periods is subject to much misinterpreation of the reported data (thus the climategate fiasco); ice core data shows that global warming precedes CO2 spikes, not the other way around; the funding mechanism to produce such bogus IPPC statements is carved into ideological and bureaucratic stone, not science. Alarmist science is not, in fact, science.
However, economic collapse is a real thing, in real time. The environmental extremists are causing it in real time. This is what the YouTube clip was about.
What does creationism have to do with this discussion? I already said that I accept evolutionary theory, coming out of Darwin. However, it sounds like you do not, since you seem to deny the dominance of the human species over all other species, due to natural selection.
You more than answered the questions, for my purpose, thank you.
You don't believe in the scientific consensus outlined in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
You went further, spinning off wildly in different directions, as well as assigning assumptions based on my asking two questions.
Again - thanks.
(don't forget to stock up on tin foil)
"(don't forget to stock up on tin foil)"
There is no need for tin foil on my part. I rely upon facts, and I do not accept the tin foil assertions of those who accept the IPPC report, as reported. I actually ask questions, and am willing to accept scientific results. I draw the line at the likes of Paul Ehrlich, and Al Gore and Piltdown Man, all of which satisfied the scientific consensus at the time (and Donald Duck, too).
America is being driven down, economically, by the environmetal extremists. This is what the YouTube clip is about. I suggest that everybody watch it, then make up your own mind.
Good video, but it's old news. This has all been done before. Last time, in the end, it failed:
The greens would do well to take their heads out of the sand and remember Santayana's famous quote.
" but it's old news. This has all been done before. Last time, in the end, it failed"
I don't think we need to resort to old Nazi models. We can simply use rational anaysyis of current scientific data, taken with a skeptical view. The mere fact that the "greens" believe an IPPC report, is no reason for rational people to believe it. The IPPC is a very political report, although it does contain interesting data. The main problem with the IPPC is that it leaves out contrary opinions, based on the same data. It is political science at its worst.
Our economy should not be held hostage to the black holes of green irrationaliy. The true greenest future is the one that promotes a prosperous future for the most people, and that means low-cost energy.
The price of natural gas has gone from $15 per unit to now $2 per unit
That will be a huge competitive advantage for the US moving forward.
When science gets politicised, it's no longer science.
Laurence, I hope you are right, but I think history will repeat itself on this one.
Great link. Thanks.
- flash -
CostCo named best price on bulk tinfoil purchases!
Enough for all the conspiracy theorists and deniers, plus, includes 48 oz Redbull, for those late night search-fests of the denier websites.
You know, the ones that offer studies that haven't been peer reviewed, climate studies that have been done by geologists, or by folks who get money from big oil via Heartland, etc..
A sale on tinfoil and redbull - hallelujah!
Nice to see all the usual suspects here: S P OO WW etc...
Y'all have a nice day.
-it's kinda warm out there, what does it mean?!?!?
"-it's kinda warm out there, what does it mean?!?!?"
What does that mean to you? Should we be shutting down the national ecoonomy, because we experience a warm day in May, in California?
"What does that mean to you? Should we be shutting down the national ecoonomy, because we experience a warm day in May, in California?"
Ya knew he's bite, didn't ya......
"Ya knew he's bite, didn't ya......"
No. But you seem to think so.
The correct language would be "You knew he'd bite, didn't you...."
The true believers of the IPPC political science often fail to grasp facts, and they also don't expose their knowledge of the English language. However, the the main problem is that they could care less about the enormous negative economic effects of their true beliefs.
Dude, or duddette, as the case may be,
The tinfoil hats are good on a sunny day like this, keeps the rays reflecting off elsewhere instead of warning yer head. And warns us all what's coming down the street.
Uh-oh, I mentioned the weather again! Gotta quit doing that when in conversation with conspiracy theorists.
Don't want to afflict Larry with my po' grasp of da Engie
I hear Al Qaeda is setting up a superPAC for Republicans.
"I hear Al Qaeda is setting up a superPAC for Republicans."
Al Qaeda would support the destruction of America, by advocating on behalf of the enviromental extremists that want to constrain fossil fuels and nuclear energy That is what the YouTube clip is about..."If I wanted America to Fail". Please watch it.
For shame, Larry, conflating AQ and folks who want to protect our environment.
In the nineties, bin Ladin published various long winded manifestos that, once you got past the anti America-the-great-satan, and anti-Israel stuff basically listed his goals:
1. Arabian oil was too cheap, around ten bucks in the nineties, he wanted it up over $100 a barrel, preferably $144 a barrel.
2. US troops off Saudi soil
3. get the US involved in a land war in Afghanistan or elsewhere so he could bleed the US the way he did to Russia
4. remove the secular dictators, like Saddam
With Bush's help, he pretty much got what he wanted.
He said nothing about environmentalists. So I'm more likely to consider "curmudgeon" and his flippant comment than your conflation.
Web Link Particularly the afterword)
That's pretty sad, Larry, conflating the two.
If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Developers and Development
By Steve Levy | 21 comments | 1,466 views
Savoring this year's "lasts"
By Sally Torbey | 9 comments | 1,054 views
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 1,013 views
What it's like to have a tween
By Jessica T | 0 comments | 893 views
2013 Holiday Book Gift Guide (Part 1)
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 502 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.