Town Square

Post a New Topic

Man uses bat, cane in Palo Alto road-rage melee

Original post made on Apr 11, 2012

An Easter visit to Stanford Hospital turned into a violent attack in the middle of the road Sunday when a bat-wielding man struck a woman and then hit a man with a cane in a fit of road rage.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, April 11, 2012, 4:29 PM

Comments (15)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by mug shot?
a resident of Adobe-Meadows
on Apr 11, 2012 at 4:45 pm

How about a mug shot of the suspect?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Joanne
a resident of Downtown North
on Apr 11, 2012 at 8:17 pm

Maybe need to put in metal detectors on Quarry Road.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Guido
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Apr 11, 2012 at 10:00 pm

Julian will be charged, and his son will also face charges. Not a very nice way to model conflict resolution for your kid. And, it seems that the boy has learned his lessons well. Here's hoping that they demand a 10-session anger management course for Julian and his kid, in addition to a LOT of community service. Oh, yeah, as part of the kid's penalty, he should be kept from applying for a driver's license until he's 21. If he already has a permit, it should be taken away.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by wow
a resident of Meadow Park
on Apr 11, 2012 at 10:20 pm

like father, like son.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Web2.0
a resident of Downtown North
on Apr 11, 2012 at 10:21 pm

It sounds like the "victim" was an active participant in the melee. Last time i checked stopping your car after a road rage incident and confronting the aggressor does not usually lead to a fruitful discussion. Also the article doesn't say who/or what the road rage was about. Did the "victim" cut of Julian and when Julian honk did the "victim" brake check him to teach him a lesson. And then they both got out of there cars to settle it. But the "victim" had already called his boy who was following him and they knew they would have the upper hand....I would love to hear both sides of the story.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by kongjie
a resident of College Terrace
on Apr 12, 2012 at 11:20 am

kongjie is a registered user.

too bad the police arrived so promptly. I want to know what else Julian had in that trunk of wonders. Lawn darts? Can of tuna fish? A bacon stretcher?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bagley
a resident of Evergreen Park
on Apr 12, 2012 at 12:19 pm

Video! Video! I want to see some video of this! Guess they had a return-to-the-hospital wish.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of South of Midtown
on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:25 pm

Not unlike Planning & Transportation meetings at our own Palo Alto City Hall.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dennis
a resident of Downtown North
on Apr 12, 2012 at 2:27 pm

A good read which badly misses on one of the pillars of reportage: "Why"


 +   Like this comment
Posted by pearl
a resident of another community
on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:39 pm

The kid needs to be charged, as well. And, the father and the kid both need to attend anger management classes, as well as do 500 hours community service each. Plus, they should both be put on probation for five years. And, someone make sure the kid has dealt with his anger problems before he gets behind the wheel.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Enough!
a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 pm

Why didn't they arrest his disgusting kid too?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Retired Teacher
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Apr 12, 2012 at 6:11 pm

Let's see. A juvenile punches a police officer several times, and doesn't get arrested and sent to a detention center? Why? Hillcrest is too far away? The Santa Clara center is too full? The punches didn't meet the full force test? He's really a wonderful kid and was just defending his innocent father, the bottom of whose baseball bat was assaulted by the woman who tried to intervene?

I'm not even what you might call a law and order type, but this strikes me as ridiculous. I'm sure the juvenile authorities will get around to talking to this young paragon of virtue sometime soon. Let's hope it's before he breaks another windshield or two and whacks a Redwood City police officer.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Retired Teacher
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Apr 12, 2012 at 6:11 pm

Let's see. A juvenile punches a police officer several times, and doesn't get arrested and sent to a detention center? Why? Hillcrest is too far away? The Santa Clara center is too full? The punches didn't meet the full force test? He's really a wonderful kid and was just defending his innocent father, the bottom of whose baseball bat was assaulted by the woman who tried to intervene?

I'm not even what you might call a law and order type, but this strikes me as ridiculous. I'm sure the juvenile authorities will get around to talking to this young paragon of virtue sometime soon. Let's hope it's before he breaks another windshield or two and whacks a Redwood City police officer.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Anon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:37 pm

Sheesh, too bad we cannot banish people anymore. None of these people sound sensible or rational - it would be nice if we could just say - leave California and do not come back.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by A Local Motorist
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 12, 2012 at 8:51 pm

A "fit of road rage"??? What an over-used term used to play down felonious criminal behavior. Why not describe it by it's rightful terms -- felony assault with a deadly weapon, battery, possibly assault with intent to commit murder. Using the term "road rage" only diminishes the severity of the criminal nature of the acts. It's time we called these actions what they are - a criminal act by a violent perpetrator.

The only relevance of the "road rage" classification is that it qualifies the acts of the individuals as proof that they are emotionally and psychologically incapable of accepting the responsibilities of driving, and should be banned for life (after serving prison terms) from driving or riding in private passenger vehicles - in other words, walk or take public transportation from now on.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Mixx, Scott's Seafood replacement, opens in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 1,728 views

Ten Steps to Get Started with Financial Aid
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,378 views

All Parking Permits Should Have a Fee
By Steve Levy | 21 comments | 1,359 views

For the Love of Pie
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,271 views

Repeating and “You” Sentences
By Chandrama Anderson | 3 comments | 823 views