Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Jul 15, 2007
Sure, as long as we don't have to expand the quantity of potential visitors (and load on the park's natural resources) by 15% just to get the fire protection we've always had ANYWAY.
btw, we already share the park, but it wouldn't hurt to share it more with LAH, for a visitor fee from LAH residents _as they attend_, ONLY if LAH officials agree to help pay for the fire staton, FIRST. No pay, no play. How about making back some of the investment Palo Altans put into that park - that's what the fee would cover. Any other community wanting "in" has to do the same. We pay fees to get nto other parks, why not this one?
Further, ANY agreement to share shuold NOT be given in perpetuity. Otherwise, long-term, FHP will be overrun, guaranteed (I cn heat the 100db music parties - along with boistrous revelers. at 1:00AM, already - not to mention the slow degradation of the FHP environment, just what the donor DIDN'T want.
What fees do you pay to get into what parks? Golden Gate, Central Park, Rancho San Antonio,
I'm not against fees but let's be neighborly to not nmbp. If ever there was a time to change the trend of "No, it's mine," to one of sharing this earth that belongs to us all it is now.
How do you plan to close the park? I watched on Saturday morning as a whole group of bicyclists swept down Page Mill Road at high speed and entered the park through the exit gate, not one of them was stopped. Local residents hike in all the time. There is no way you can keep people out of the park.
By extension ALL parks in California should be closed if they do not
have fire service.
I fail to understand how the public is missing the fact that all this talk about funding Station #8, along with other cuts to services would not be an issue with out the Gross Mismanagement of public funds. I can speak about the Fire Department. Millions of dollars have been wasted, then covered up. Maybe they do not care? Maybe they feel that nothing can be done about it? Have thing gotten to far out of hand to be fixed? If one wants to find the truth out ask,look,listen,investigate. Do not leave this up to the crimanals who have gained from there actions of miss leading the public and hiding the truth..
Fireman, either name specifc examples of _proven_ malfeasance, or stop spamming these forums with unproven allegations. Maybe there has been malfeasance, but your dozens of accusing posts have not shown this to be the case.
That aside, it's time for the union _leadership_ to get wise, and stop entrnching themselves on the issue of insisting that only senior fire personnel man Station 8. The union has my support, but lately, every time I hear the unmovable positions on this issue, it makes me want to write a letter to the union's MEMBERS, so that they can realize that some citizens are fed up with union _leadership_ posturing.
Remember the auto and steel workers unions? Remember how outdated and unmoving leaders - and endless posturing - DESTROYED the leverage of those unions. Think about that, firemen - and get your leaders back on track so that you don't find yourselves and the risks you take marginalized by a union politico.
And good luck out there! Be safe!
The park should not close due to 'inadequate' fire protection. It should become, if anything, a 'use at your own risk' park.
How little coverage is proposed? The single truck being present (or not) at station 8 is not going to make much difference.
For very small fires, the ranger trucks at the park are equipped with water and firefighting gear. They can be first responders.
Also, I'm not wild about opening it up to other residents of other cities.
There areas are already protected. If a fire would break out, having a single truck isn't going to make much of a difference. Keep in mind that the second fire at Stanford happened when the area was closed. Having people there might even allow for the early reporting of a fire.
It would make difference if a fire started next to the park and your home was in the path of the fire. A small ranger truck is not going to be able to protect your home like a 500 gallon/large fire hose/large fire pump/ THREE firefighters-fire engine would. Just like the one that is at the Foothills Park Station went it is staff.
Remember the 1985 fire (11 homes loss). That is why the Foothills Park Station was built.
Tim a Brush rig can make a differance. A fire will double in size every 5min or less. If you can get to it fast you can handle it. Wait to long and it will be unstopable. I told you the story about the brush rig we had in the PAFD. When we got to the fire we could of handled it with the small unit. It was junk and would not start the fire burned right past turnning into walls of 50 foot flames. I was on duty for the Fire you mentioned. I thought here we go again. see the new rig was lost for 2 years. when it was found it was close to 3 years old when we put it into service.. The City type Fire engines can not go off road,are to big to work with on wildland fires for the most case..
"Remember the 1985 fire (11 homes loss). That is why the Foothills Park Station was built."
Tim, Not only do I remember it, I know several people who watched it. The first responder should have been the firehouse on Hanover, not Foothill Park. There was no stopping that one. Once a fire starts in high oats, with a wind, it is very fast and very hot.
That 1985 fire has no real value, as a political arugment, with respect to the FHP debate.
Hint: If ones wants to prevent one's home from being devoured in a wildland fire, clear one's land of fuel, build with stucco and have a fire-resistant roof.
Station 8 fire rig can go off road. The rig from Hanover station can not. The last wildland fire (Foothill Expressway) about a week ago, the rig from Station 8 made a difference in putting out that fire. Note: the first rigs on the scene (in 1985) were from Hanover - Station 2 and Arastradero- Station 5. I know, I was on-duty that day.
Yes P.A fireman, I was on duty that day also. Engine#2.. This whole saga about openning Sta#8,Getting the Paramedic program in a condition that the Citizens have paid for.IE staffing 2 paramedic rigs. How much time/money and effort was wated on the Paramedic engine program that was so screwed up by Fire Admin That the citizen paid over 1 million $ for junk, A reseve Truck that we paided for that we can not use most of the time needed, How the union has been so corupt/on the take for years,selling out the members along with the public. Screwing over employee after employee. This is not rocket stuff.. Are leaders are lost in space. The Fire Dept has 2 to 3x the management as it should.. One could save at least 1 million a year on Cheif's. How many safety issues for how many years. What a joke.. Do you have a SCBA that Fits and hooks to every other one in the dept, or are you the one who got the short end of the stick,Got boots, have to ride on a Hi-Tech. Had to fight the city for every thing,because they have wasted so much $ that is is eaiser to get it from the emplyees then to admitt to wasteing it The firfighters need to stand up and let the public know how screwed up it is. its not there fault.. FIRE ADMIN/management,City managers have dropped the ball for many years. They are the ones who control overtime, the money,cut the services by wasteing $,misleading the public.. Any money issue is theres.. We just ride around on little red trucks trying to help people.. The union has been on the take for many years ...even before sandbag scandels. This is a basic part of what the citizens of Palo Alto should get.. This is not like trying to slove world hunger,polution,why the hell people keep killing other people.. Don't you ever get sick of looking the other way???
The world she is not FLAT, The wheel has been a round for a very long time; Clue For the management of Palo Alto it looks like a donut. So why spend millions of dollars, hire cheif and consultants to try and reinvent it.
If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Barron Park
- Charleston Gardens
- Charleston Meadows
- College Terrace
- Community Center
- Crescent Park
- Downtown North
- Duveneck/St. Francis
- Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
- Esther Clark Park
- Evergreen Park
- Greater Miranda
- Green Acres
- Greendell/Walnut Grove
- Leland Manor/Garland Drive
- Meadow Park
- Monroe Park
- Old Palo Alto
- Palo Alto Hills
- Palo Alto Orchards
- Palo Verde
- South of Midtown
- St. Claire Gardens
- The Greenhouse
- Triple El
- University South
- Addison School
- Barron Park School
- Duveneck School
- Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
- El Carmelo School
- Escondido School
- Fairmeadow School
- Gunn High School
- Hoover School
- JLS Middle School
- Jordan Middle School
- Juana Briones School
- Nixon School
- Ohlone School
- Palo Alto High School
- Palo Verde School
- Santa Rita (Los Altos)
- Terman Middle School
- Walter Hays School
- another community
- Another Palo Alto neighborhood
- East Palo Alto
- Los Altos
- Los Altos Hills
- Menlo Park
- Mountain View
- Portola Valley
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Developers and Development
By Steve Levy | 28 comments | 1,636 views
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 1,130 views
What it's like to have a tween
By Jessica T | 0 comments | 1,007 views
The Changing American Family
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 434 views
The Visual Magic of "The Great Beauty"
By Anita Felicelli | 5 comments | 411 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Palo Alto
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.