Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS   CRIMES & INCIDENTS
  HISTORIC PHOTOS   ISSUES BEYOND PALO ALTO   MOVIES PALO ALTO ISSUES
  RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   INAUGURATION BLOG 2013
  JAY THORWALDSON'S BLOG   LONDON 94301   PAUL LOSCH'S COMMUNITY BLOG   REBECCA WALLACE'S AD LIBS BLOG
  STEPHEN LEVY'S ECONOMY BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MESSAGE BOARD VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
PAUSD spending of Measure A funds
Palo Alto Issues, posted by lorraine sparaco, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Jun 28, 2006 at 2:41 pm

As a tax paying senior in Palo Alto, I’m wondering what the PAUSD is doing with my voluntary Measure A Parcel Tax Assessement of $473 per year. During the election, they claimed to need it to raise teachers’ salaries, hire classroom assistance, reduce class sizes, and reinstate various programs. Now, they apparently don’t feel the need to follow through on those promises, but are instead moving forward with a highly specialized private school “Choice” program to offer Mandarin to only about 240 students. They claim they will get outside funding for the startup costs, but it seems to me they are instituting a long term program that permanently increases the overhead structure of the district. Why are they going forward with Mandarin Immersion without first taking care of the basics? Personally, I’m not willing to fund private school education for a few lottery winners in the district, and so if they move forward with MI I’ll have no choice but to opt out of the Measure A parcel tax. Do tax payers in this community care if the school board implements designer enrichment programs on a whim instead of making reasonable business decisions with our tax dollars, for long term health of our district? Afterall, our high Palo Alto property values are almost solely driven on the quality of our schools. Why should we let a special interest group, with the help of a few elected board members basically hijack one of our schools and install a private school program?


Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by Jack, a resident of the College Terrace neighborhood, on Aug 10, 2006 at 6:32 pm

Keep watching this board folks. From what I'm hearing, you ain't seen nothin yet! It only gets more bizarre...


Posted by Dave, a resident of the Crescent Park neighborhood, on Aug 10, 2006 at 8:09 pm

By bizarre - you mean these comments, or what's happening in the district?


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   


Best Website
First Place
2009-2011

 

Palo Alto Online   © 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.