Town Square

Post a New Topic

Palo Alto firefighters douse rooftop blaze

Original post made on Mar 12, 2012

A fire that officials say began on the roof caused nearly $30,000 in damages to a home on Georgia Avenue in Palo Alto Saturday afternoon. No one was injured.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, March 12, 2012, 9:22 AM

Comments (6)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Willster
a resident of Palo Alto Hills
on Mar 12, 2012 at 10:25 am

Great stop! See what full staffing can do? Support your local FD. No personnel cuts or station brown-outs.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by David Pepperdine
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 12, 2012 at 1:58 pm

Let's invest more in neighbors too, since it was an alert neighbor who spotted this. I propose giving neighbors lifetime healthcare, retirement benefits after 20 years in the neighborhood (with opportunities to spike it with unused sick pay). Let's all line up to vote on this too.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by dennis
a resident of Downtown North
on Mar 12, 2012 at 2:36 pm

That David Pepperdine is on the right track, with the proviso that the neighbors also respond to emergency calls beyond their neighborhood as well as actually engage in extinguishing fires, containing hazardous material spillage, administering first-aid, responding to vehicle crashes, and the routine rescue of endangered residents and pets.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wondering
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Mar 12, 2012 at 2:54 pm

"great stop!" is a phase only used by firefighters. I wonder...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by actual neighbor
a resident of Green Acres
on Mar 12, 2012 at 10:49 pm

Nice work by our firefighters! Please ignore the trolls, they don't speak for most of us!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Malik
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Mar 12, 2012 at 11:08 pm

Willster, if you want more firefighters, we'll have to stop cow-towing to their union and paying them 200K per year to mostly idle and respond to medical calls. If we bid the service out at market rate, we could double the size of the department if we wanted to (not that its necessary) and still have money left over for roads, infrastructure, schools, and other such nonsense that the city has decided is less important than overpaying our fire union.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Flirtation
By Chandrama Anderson | 4 comments | 1,573 views

King of the Slides
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 1,214 views

Standardized Test Prep: When to Start and Whom to Hire?
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,036 views

The Future of our Parks: Public Workshops this Week
By Cathy Kirkman | 0 comments | 607 views

Subverting open, fair and honest debate (Measure D)
By Douglas Moran | 6 comments | 602 views