Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS   CRIMES & INCIDENTS
  HISTORIC PHOTOS ISSUES BEYOND PALO ALTO   MOVIES   PALO ALTO ISSUES
  RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   INAUGURATION BLOG 2013
  JAY THORWALDSON'S BLOG   LONDON 94301   PAUL LOSCH'S COMMUNITY BLOG   REBECCA WALLACE'S AD LIBS BLOG
  STEPHEN LEVY'S ECONOMY BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MESSAGE BOARD VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
East Palo Alto to sue Four Seasons and developer
Issues Beyond Palo Alto, posted by Jocelyn Dong, associate editor of the Palo Alto Weekly, on Jun 23, 2006 at 1:23 pm
Jocelyn Dong is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online

The East Palo Alto City Council agreed in closed session Tuesday night to file a lawsuit against the Four Seasons Hotel and its developer, LDW Resorts, as a way to resolve a dispute between the hotel and the city.

The city had agreed, years ago, to allow the hotel to forgo paying the city’s 12 percent hotel occupancy tax for three and half years or a maximum of $8.4 million providing the hotel opened by November, 2005. The hotel opened Feb. 1, 2006.

Because the hotel did not open by the stated deadline, the city regards the earlier agreement as void, City Attorney Michael Lawson said.

The Four Seasons is a luxury, 200-room hotel located next to Highway 101 on the west side of the freeway.

The city had reached the earlier agreement with the hotel and the hotel’s developer as an inducement to the development, which the city regards as a key portion of its future because of the 12 percent tax on occupancy. The price of the rooms starts at $325 a night during the week and $225 a night on weekends.

--Don Kazak, Palo Alto Weekly staff writer


Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by J.Johnson, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Aug 25, 2006 at 11:18 pm

Here's a thought: what did their agreement SAY would happen in the event that the hotel didn't open by Nov 2005?

If it didn't address that possibility, then EPA should be firing its attorneys. A good attorney makes his/her money by thinking up ALL the contingencies, the possible outcomes and making sure they are addressed in contracts. Any reasonable layperson can think up all the expected possibilities and get them addressed, that's no big feat.

Per the norm, it sounds like the City of EPA staffers didn't do their job. Too bad, the Westin corporate folks will stomp them.


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   


Best Website
First Place
2009-2011

 

Palo Alto Online   © 2013 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.