Town Square

Post a New Topic

Council seeks new path to updated growth vision

Original post made on Aug 7, 2014

Faced with four different visions for future growth, Palo Alto's council members quibbled and agonized Wednesday night over the latest proposal to update the city's land-use bible before settling for a fifth option: none of the above.

This story contains 59 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (2)

Like this comment
Posted by Cheryl Lilienstein
a resident of Barron Park
on Aug 7, 2014 at 7:56 am

Thank you city council for recommending that data be produced in order to understand present conditions before making future plans.

Thank you for choosing to focus attention on fixing what's wrong.

Thank you Karen Holman for stressing the urgency of modifying the zoning code to protect the city from new developments in the city's commercial areas. I hope Mayor Shepherd takes that recommendation seriously and shifts away from her usual We-are-looking-to-the-future-and-Palo Alto-is-developing-everything-because-it's-good-for-us-to-do-that-because-the-world-is-watching position. After all, the election is coming.

Thank you Gennady for noticing that the Planning and Transportation committee (that has been responsible for allowing a lot of the extreme growth to happen) has proposed revisions to every chapter in the present Comp Plan. And that this has been done with little input from the community.




Like this comment
Posted by Input
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 7, 2014 at 8:45 am

I'm not sure the agonizing was because of the growth options or the format itself to look at options, which Council is responsible for.

Anyway, whatever gets data out first is important, and explaining exactly what is being done.

Mark Weiss' observation that among the revisions being done without public input is replacing the word park. The new term is urban something or other, didn't sound like it was nature.

Is there a summary of what has been revised so far, in case that needs to be revised?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Sam's Chowder House Palo Alto to become burger chain
By Elena Kadvany | 23 comments | 10,970 views

Family Planning: Don't F%@K Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,228 views

Sing and celebrate
By Sally Torbey | 5 comments | 480 views

 

Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 23 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away more than $4 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. When you make a donation, every dollar is automatically doubled, and 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.

DONATE HERE